Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275016

Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

K Wills (Shill #3), in
<news:tmilua9paigeg612l6p7aj09lqvloa9pal@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:06:10 -0500, Rocky (aka
> Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
> woman-stalking truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:

>>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote:

>>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion?

>>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects
>>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards.

>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation,

>> A<SMACKAKOOK!>

> Liar. Standard background radiation was present. Also, the
> tritium from exit signs was present. While tritium isn't actually a
> form of radiation, it emits beta electrons, it was present.
> Is there a different lie you'd like to try?

>>> no seismic signature

>> Bu<SMACKAKOOK!>

> Those who were very close probably thought it was equal to a 5+.
> But, in reality, it was slightly over 2. And it wasn't due to an
> earthquake.

>>> no EMP

>> Ju<SMACKAKOOK!>

> This has been explained to you several times by several people.
> There was no such EMP. Had a nuclear EMP occurred, the video would
> have ended at the point of the pulse. All the electronics would have
> fried.
> The helicopters in the sky would have all come falling down to
> the ground, since they too would no longer be functioning. And most,
> if not all, of the electrical grid of Manhattan would have fried,
> meaning no electricity for the island.

>>> no fireball

>> Ju<SMACKAKOOK!>

> You're lying. Still.

>>> no mushroom cloud

>> Y<SMACKAKOOK!>

> There are no mushroom clouds shown in the video. None.

>>> h<SMACKAKOOK!>

> For goodness sake! Learn how to post properly, stupid.

So now the broken-brained little retard Roger Wittekind is k'laming
that the existence of background radiation at the WTC site for all but
beta radiation (and that only caused by slightly elevated nano-curie
concentrations of tritium from aircraft exit signs and LEO weapons
sights) is somehow proof that his k'lamed dozens of nuclear weapons
were detonated at the WTC site. LOL

He gets around there being no radiation or EMP by k'laming his magical
nukes had magical detonators that somehow made them EMP and radiation
free. LOL

In addition, the lack of any explosion as he's k'lamed means they were
using "Hushaboom technology" to attenuate the noise of the nuclear
explosions. LOL

On top of that, his inability to understand the sophisticated physics
program NIST used to model the WTC towers and visually demonstrate the
progressive collapse progress means he labels that sophisticated
physics program a "cartoon". LOL

Meanwhile, he's run away from providing *any* proof, choosing instead
to cling to his delusions and *expand* his insanity by glomming onto
several other whacko conspiracy theories invented by broken-brained
kooks just as paranoid-delusional schizophrenic as he is.

What he's failed to account for, that unresolvable logic hole that he
still cannot resolve, is that 14 second gap between the video
disturbance on the WCBS video due to satellite uplink interference
(what he k'lames is an EMP) and the tower shaking on the WCBS video
due to the central column buckling (what he claims is the compressive
blast from a nuclear weapon)... he's yet to explain how that nuke was
magically able to slow down the propagation of its compressive blast
wave so it only traveled 77 meters (how deep Roger k'lames the nukes
were buried (note that his delusion has changed from dozens of miles
deep to only 77 meters deep as his brain squirms and writhes in trying
to find some way of attaining sufficient plausibility such that it
doesn't have to admit *he* *is* *wrong*) in 14 seconds. That's only
12.3 MPH... a compressive blast normally travels through the earth at
from ~11,000 MPH to ~36,000 MPH dependent upon soil composition.

It's the world's first nuclear explosion that a man can hope to
survive by sprinting away from it! LOL

And now he's got a second unresolvable logic hole to contend with...
given that the Sedan nuclear explosion of 104 kT caused the
displacement of 11 million tons of soil, and given that the resulting
crater was 330 feet deep and 1280 feet diameter, and given that the
dust cloud from the 104 kT nuclear explosion (smaller than Roger's
k'lamed 150 kT nukes) expanded to a diameter of 5 miles, and given
that the explosion lifted a dome of soil 300 feet above the desert
floor before it vented, and given that the mushroom cloud reached to
12,000 feet, and given that the radiation at the lip of the crater was
500 Rads per hour... why hasn't Rocky explained:
1) why there weren't dozens (since he's k'lamed dozens of nuclear
weapons were detonated at the WTC site) of *larger* (given that his
k'lamed 150 kT nukes were larger than the Sedan shot and he k'lamed
they were buried shallower) gigantic holes that should have been at
least 400 feet deep and 1500 feet in diameter;

2) why there were not dozens of mushroom clouds extending to
approximately 15,000 feet; 

3) why there was no nuclear weapon-related radiation at the WTC site
after his k'lamed dozens of nukes detonated;

4) why, given that even *ONE* such nuclear weapon would have lifted
the WTC's relatively light 1.5 million tons several hundred feet in
the air, didn't the WTC towers rise in height even one inch;

5) and why all of NYC wasn't covered in radioactive dirt from the
estimated 400,000,000 *tons* of soil that would have been displaced
had all his k'lamed nukes been detonated?

Bwahahaaaa! Oh, retards are *so* entertaining.

Roger, your broken brain is glitching and feeding you utterly
impossible delusions. You require immediate psychiatric intervention
before you become a danger to yourself and others. Take your meds,
Roger.

Remember... you *are* being surveilled. One wrong word and it's off to
the home for the criminally insane for you, where your broken little
brain will be probed, shocked and medicated until you admit *you*
*are* *wrong*.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
    Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
      Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
        Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
            Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
              Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
        Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
          Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
  Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500

csiph-web