Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #433940

Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation
Date 2017-09-26 21:45 +0200
Message-ID <f2vp2eFe3fvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <2a741386-495b-4222-9fb8-004e69ced8ec@googlegroups.com> <f2qfg2F72bfU1@mid.individual.net> <oq91t1$5nf$1@dont-email.me> <f2t3k2Fpkv6U1@mid.individual.net> <oqbn95$qu9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 25.09.2017 um 22:00 schrieb Poutnik:
> Dne 25/09/2017 v 21:26 Thomas Heger napsal(a):
>
>>
>> I made the statement, that material objects for one observer are
>> invisible or appear as radiation for other observers.
>>
>> ('ones matter is the other ones radiation')
>>
> That is great. It can help to avoid traffic accidents.
>

I'm afraid, that this effect will not be very helpful under usual 
circumstances.

But I can try to explain the (assumed) effect:

I use a certain symbolic representation of 'elements of spacetime'.

These 'elements' are pointlike and interconnected to the environment.

The symbolic form is a spinning ball, where the equator needs to twist 
twice to return.

The axis of rotation is the axis of time.

Now I regard matter as 'timelike stable patterns', which are produced by 
these interconnected spinning balls.

What we call static fields is inverse to time and lies on a 
perpendicular plane (perpendicular to the axis of time), that is comoving.

An atom is then a certain 'structure' (of spacetime), with a masslike 
core and a spacelike field around.

So: matter depends on the axis of time. And the realm, where matter 
stays stable I call a 'time domaine'.

In between the axis of time and the comoving plane, at the angle of 45°' 
we find light (the future and past light cone).

Relativistic effects are caused by acceleration (not by velocity) and 
this could bent the axis of time (to a different 'time domaine').

So the former axis of stability for matter and that of another realm, 
with a different axis of time, stand in an angle.

This would make the matter of one realm observed from the other look 
like light.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Failures of the Galilean transformation (was: The Song of Lt. Cdr. Data) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-20 17:23 +0200
  Failures of the Galilean transformation (was: The Song of Lt. Cdr. Data) "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 08:36 -0700
  Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-21 06:29 -0700
      Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-22 20:27 +0200
        Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-22 12:13 -0700
          Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-22 21:36 +0200
            Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Kos Etrakis <uar@ksskkwi.ck> - 2017-09-22 20:09 +0000
              Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-23 12:10 +0200
            Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-22 13:30 -0700
              Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-23 12:56 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-23 05:09 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-24 21:31 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Poutnik <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2017-09-24 21:43 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 21:26 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Poutnik <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2017-09-25 22:00 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-26 21:45 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-29 01:52 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-27 09:50 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-24 22:57 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 10:23 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-25 02:07 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 21:14 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-25 13:10 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-26 22:12 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-26 22:41 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-28 21:09 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-28 13:14 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-29 14:10 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-29 06:09 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-30 16:39 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-30 08:12 -0700

csiph-web