Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #433730

Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation
Date 2017-09-25 10:23 +0200
Message-ID <f2rsofFgh3mU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <f3526ab1-0dfa-45db-9416-292869f93d4b@googlegroups.com> <f2msvaFcbihU1@mid.individual.net> <2a741386-495b-4222-9fb8-004e69ced8ec@googlegroups.com> <f2qfg2F72bfU1@mid.individual.net> <3c19801d-7773-44ec-8b5d-38902280db57@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 25.09.2017 um 07:57 schrieb mlwozniak@wp.pl:
> W dniu niedziela, 24 września 2017 21:31:15 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas Heger napisał:
>
>> The laws of nature are not changing in time.
>
> "Laws" and "nature" are excluding each other.
>
>> So, something wrong in times of Galileo is still wrong today.
>
> Right. Nobody was seeing trees and buildings running around
> him in Galileo's time and nobody is seeing them now.
> Coordinate - what does this word mean? Co-ord - does it sound
> a bit familiar?
> Coordinates are to be COMMON, poor idiot.  Your
> observer dependent frames are a functional nonsense.
> And nature has nothing to do with them.
>


Sure. But WE have something to do with 'observer dependent frames'.

IOW: common human beings regard themselves as more or less at rest, even 
if this not true.

Earth rotates around its axis and swirls together with the entire solar 
system around the center of our galaxy. But still we think, that our 
chair is not moving, while we sit on it.

So, physical truth and common sense do not match. But if common sense 
could not be used in physics, how do we define something correct then?

Possible questions are: what is actually time? Is matter for one 
observer also matter for all possible others? Is mass constant?


(And so forth...)

You make a statement about coordinates ('Coordinates are to be COMMON').

But how do you justify this demand? If space and time are in fact 
'relative', then coordinates are not common at all, but 'relative'.

Since we lack any other possible references, 'relative' means 'relative 
to the observer' (what you rejected).


TH

..

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Failures of the Galilean transformation (was: The Song of Lt. Cdr. Data) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-20 17:23 +0200
  Failures of the Galilean transformation (was: The Song of Lt. Cdr. Data) "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-09-20 08:36 -0700
  Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-21 06:29 -0700
      Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-22 20:27 +0200
        Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-22 12:13 -0700
          Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-22 21:36 +0200
            Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Kos Etrakis <uar@ksskkwi.ck> - 2017-09-22 20:09 +0000
              Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-23 12:10 +0200
            Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-22 13:30 -0700
              Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-23 12:56 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-23 05:09 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-24 21:31 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Poutnik <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2017-09-24 21:43 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 21:26 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Poutnik <poutnik@privacy.net> - 2017-09-25 22:00 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-26 21:45 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-29 01:52 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-09-27 09:50 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-24 22:57 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 10:23 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-25 02:07 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-25 21:14 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-25 13:10 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-26 22:12 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-26 22:41 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-28 21:09 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-28 13:14 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-29 14:10 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-29 06:09 -0700
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-30 16:39 +0200
                Re: Failures of the Galilean transformation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-09-30 08:12 -0700

csiph-web