Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #407315
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: the LIGO signal |
| Date | 2017-01-31 18:47 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <efato8F163qU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <f33c9c3c-781a-429d-8a94-0f737476e94a@googlegroups.com> <ef7l6rFc0q8U1@mid.individual.net> <2512d979-a8b4-49c1-aea0-63fdbcc8dac5@googlegroups.com> <efadi5FstpcU1@mid.individual.net> <5e767499-3923-403b-a5cb-e8edc48a6e2f@googlegroups.com> |
On 31/01/2017 6:36 PM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu wtorek, 31 stycznia 2017 04:11:03 UTC+1 użytkownik Sylvia Else napisał: > >> But they have a model, derived from general relativity, the describes >> the collision of black-holes. The model predicts a waveform that is >> dependent on the individual masses. > > Bullshit. Your relativity was never sure, whether > gravitational waves exist or not. > General relativity predicted the existence of gravitational waves. What was lacking was any detection of them, though that wasn't such a big surprise given their likely amplitude and the difficulty of detection. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-29 16:35 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-30 13:03 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-30 18:46 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 14:10 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-30 23:36 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 18:47 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 07:07 -0600
Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 09:16 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 15:01 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 17:33 -0600
Re: the LIGO signal "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:04 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:27 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 16:30 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-06 11:40 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-06 15:15 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 20:20 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:23 -0500
Re: the LIGO signal Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 05:27 +0100
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 13:42 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 18:06 -0500
Re: the LIGO signal Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-08 10:58 +0000
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 11:27 -0800
csiph-web