Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380877

Re: Observer in the double slit experiment

Show all headers | View raw

W dniu poniedziałek, 4 kwietnia 2016 15:45:14 UTC+2 użytkownik rotchm napisał:
> On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 8:48:44 AM UTC-4, Adrian Ferent wrote:
> > In the double slit experiment with photons, the interacting observer is an instrument, detector... 
> > If you replace the detector with a piece of metal with the same mass as the mass of the detector, the wave will collapse?
> 
> No. The wave never "collapses". The word "collapse" has nothing to do with QM and is just an embellishing word used by some authors (metaphysical interpretations). Do not parrot what authors say. Parrot what the math says. "shut up & calculate".

And, when talking about math, always remember, that
the oldest and one of most trustful pieces of it
was rejected by Great Guru that didn't believe
"common sense prejudices".

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 05:48 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 06:45 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-04-04 06:56 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:11 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:07 -0500
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:56 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:53 -0500
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-04 22:18 -0500
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-05 13:57 +1000
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 -0700
          Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0700
            Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:47 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:57 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:19 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 11:55 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 11:15 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:59 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:27 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:48 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:19 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:27 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:41 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:04 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:25 -0700

csiph-web