Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380929

Re: Observer in the double slit experiment

Message-ID	<570360EC.5B3D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-04-04 23:53 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Observer in the double slit experiment
References	<3db665d0-c9d3-4050-a5ee-1f5695979193@googlegroups.com> <a826e42a-57e4-4ae2-8355-f6a99b1b9e92@googlegroups.com> <boKdnWlzh4vrs57KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <dmgrckF4ssuU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 5/04/2016 1:18 PM, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 4/4/16 4/4/16 - 12:56 PM, Adrian Ferent wrote:
> >> No physicist tried in the last 100 years this experiment!
> >
> > Why do you just make stuff up and pretend it is true?
> >
> > There have been numerous repetitions of this experiment in the past
> > decade, and even the original experiment with electrons falls within
> > your "past 100 years". There have been many more instances of
> > closely-related experiments.
> >
> >
> > Tom Roberts
> >
> 
> Indeed, it's even been done with neutrons.
> 
> Sylvia.


how about 'machine gun bullets'??? Has it been done with 'machine gun
bullets'?

Thread

Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 05:48 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 06:45 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-04-04 06:56 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:11 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:07 -0500
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:56 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:53 -0500
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-04 22:18 -0500
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-05 13:57 +1000
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 -0700
          Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0700
            Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:47 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:57 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:19 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 11:55 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 11:15 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:59 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:27 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:48 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:19 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:27 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:41 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:04 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:25 -0700

csiph-web