Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2016-02-04 09:17 -0800
References	(4 earlier) <09ac5766-d6bd-4989-bfa7-8cfb7d886fc1@googlegroups.com> <n8vov6$gac$1@gioia.aioe.org> <67a121fe-5fe6-445d-8064-cf23faabe1aa@googlegroups.com> <122a7290-121c-4984-89c9-f0e932563ae5@googlegroups.com> <94d1375d-d343-4f30-9c3e-aaeea48eea52@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<eb756bc0-17c4-4a84-936f-e2b52d992d6e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research
From	HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

john said
Obviously, the jets from AGNs on opposite 
sides of the spinning galaxy must be of 
opposite spin.
-------------

John, serious question... How many lsd25 tablets did you take before you wrote that?



 We know such jets are 
involved in star formation: if the jet from 
one side stimulates matter stars, the jet 
from the other will cause antimatter stars 
to form. 
(Note PREDICTION about jets being opposite, Odd) 
--------------

Because I mean, this goes way beyond the level of kook. Even BJ isn't kooky enough to say that.

BTW wtf is an antimatter star?

Thread

Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:30 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 17:32 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 17:33 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:38 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:03 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:18 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:35 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:49 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:22 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:44 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 23:35 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:53 -0800
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 06:17 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 11:06 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:16 -0800
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:36 -0800
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:58 -0600
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 07:55 -0800
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:12 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:31 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:34 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:39 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:17 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:19 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:26 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:36 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:49 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:56 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:02 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 12:03 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:22 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 12:42 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:06 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:46 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-04 16:53 +0000
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 18:27 -0500
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 18:39 -0800
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:10 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:34 -0800
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 19:02 -0500
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 17:23 -0800
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:04 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:41 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:57 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:21 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:47 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:56 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:13 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 11:45 -0500

csiph-web