Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures

Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Date	2016-11-15 09:02 -0800
References	(4 earlier) <o0f0lg$hfd$1@dont-email.me> <e161bffd-fe72-4989-aba1-88205209583a@googlegroups.com> <o0f7al$94i$4@dont-email.me> <18250544-2d47-4645-9d99-ac0658e3eedd@googlegroups.com> <o0fc53$ri2$2@dont-email.me>
Message-ID	<e903224a-e1a9-4eaf-b650-d82ac868b2fd@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures
From	"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 11:13:01 AM UTC-5, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 15/11/2016 11:46 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >
> > What world do you want to live in, Mr. Man-wai Chang?  The one where
> > everything is wholly divided and isolated into finite and explicitly
> > purposed forms?  No structural building should ever be beautiful?  No
> > library should also include artwork on the walls?
> >
> > There are a plethora of people in this group who will speak to you
> > about any issue of C you'd like to address.  The C Standard language,
> > quirks of a particular C compiler implementation, etc.
> >
> > I don't know about you, but to me those subjects are interesting, but
> > they are also boring when that's all there is.  We who are C developers
> > likely share some common interests in things related to C.  Each of us
> > has a domain and range and our domains and ranges overlap in some
> > common areas.  Should we devote a dedicated group to addressing each
> > and every one of those common overlaps?  Or should be have the more
> > aesthetic world view that we can come together and share in these
> > related interests here in this group?
> >
> > That's the group I prefer.
> 
> Please don't get emotional, Master.

"And don't call me 'Master.'  I'm not a Spanish person.  I've never even
been to Spain."

Extra credit to anyone who can recognize the original quote I've adapted
here.  I left in a few clues.

>  > > > (1)  Larger FPU/SIMD register set
>  >>
> >> BTW, anyone of you using AMD PC? :)
> >
> > Mr. Man-wai Chang, are we still taking about C the programming language?
> 
> I saw registers.

I see skies of blue.  And clouds of white.  The bright blessed day.
The dark sacred night.  And I think to myself:  What a wonderful
world.

> Aren't they related to CPU architecture?

Yes.  And in the same way ham is related to a ham sandwich.

> Then could we extend the chat to AMD vs Intel CPUs?

Well of course we could, but were we to do so your hypocrisy would
start glowing.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

Thread

Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-14 08:44 -0600
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 22:46 +0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 01:29 +0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C Dutch Ingraham <spikeheron@att.net> - 2016-11-14 11:43 -0600
        Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:18 +0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:23 +0000
        Re: Simplest compiler for C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-14 20:09 +0100
          Re: Simplest compiler for C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:11 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 19:42 +0000
            Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:00 -0800
              Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:17 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:19 -0800
              Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:08 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:12 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:10 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 10:05 +0100
          Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 09:50 +0100
    Re: Simplest compiler for C luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:39 -0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 09:53 -0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:31 -0800
        Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:07 -0800
        Re: optimization "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:20 +0800
        Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 05:34 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 16:07 +0000
              Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 08:59 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 21:35 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 15:33 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 14:58 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 08:44 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:54 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 09:11 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:36 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 11:41 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:45 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 18:54 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 04:44 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 08:42 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:17 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:42 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 09:57 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:07 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 11:35 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:02 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 13:23 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 13:55 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 15:15 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 10:41 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 12:12 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 13:24 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 09:45 -0500
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 20:08 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:21 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:22 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:23 +0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:36 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:52 +0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 17:55 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 17:19 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 19:09 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-16 23:12 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-16 14:21 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-11-16 18:02 -0500
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-17 17:01 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-18 01:05 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 10:38 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-20 15:38 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-17 09:57 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:56 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:10 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:34 -0800
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:32 -0800
            [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 22:50 +0800
              Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:46 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 00:12 +0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:02 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:14 +0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:24 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:27 +0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:49 +0300
      Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:02 -0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:37 +0300
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 18:07 +0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 20:15 +0800

csiph-web