Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures

From	"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures
Date	2016-11-16 00:12 +0800
Organization	Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Message-ID	<o0fc53$ri2$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <c0d63955-d4d6-4622-b640-95ffe32a8210@googlegroups.com> <o0f0lg$hfd$1@dont-email.me> <e161bffd-fe72-4989-aba1-88205209583a@googlegroups.com> <o0f7al$94i$4@dont-email.me> <18250544-2d47-4645-9d99-ac0658e3eedd@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/11/2016 11:46 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>
> What world do you want to live in, Mr. Man-wai Chang?  The one where
> everything is wholly divided and isolated into finite and explicitly
> purposed forms?  No structural building should ever be beautiful?  No
> library should also include artwork on the walls?
>
> There are a plethora of people in this group who will speak to you
> about any issue of C you'd like to address.  The C Standard language,
> quirks of a particular C compiler implementation, etc.
>
> I don't know about you, but to me those subjects are interesting, but
> they are also boring when that's all there is.  We who are C developers
> likely share some common interests in things related to C.  Each of us
> has a domain and range and our domains and ranges overlap in some
> common areas.  Should we devote a dedicated group to addressing each
> and every one of those common overlaps?  Or should be have the more
> aesthetic world view that we can come together and share in these
> related interests here in this group?
>
> That's the group I prefer.

Please don't get emotional, Master.

 > > > (1)  Larger FPU/SIMD register set
 >>
>> BTW, anyone of you using AMD PC? :)
>
> Mr. Man-wai Chang, are we still taking about C the programming language?

I saw registers. Aren't they related to CPU architecture? Then could we 
extend the chat to AMD vs Intel CPUs?

Thread

Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-14 08:44 -0600
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 22:46 +0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 01:29 +0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C Dutch Ingraham <spikeheron@att.net> - 2016-11-14 11:43 -0600
        Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:18 +0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:23 +0000
        Re: Simplest compiler for C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-14 20:09 +0100
          Re: Simplest compiler for C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:11 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 19:42 +0000
            Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:00 -0800
              Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:17 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:19 -0800
              Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:08 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:12 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:10 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 10:05 +0100
          Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 09:50 +0100
    Re: Simplest compiler for C luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:39 -0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 09:53 -0800
      Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:31 -0800
        Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:07 -0800
        Re: optimization "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:20 +0800
        Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 +0000
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 05:34 -0800
            Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 16:07 +0000
              Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 08:59 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 21:35 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 15:33 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 14:58 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 08:44 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:54 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 09:11 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:36 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 11:41 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:45 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 18:54 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 04:44 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 08:42 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:17 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:42 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 09:57 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:07 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 11:35 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:02 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 13:23 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 13:55 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 15:15 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 10:41 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 12:12 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 13:24 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 09:45 -0500
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 20:08 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:21 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:22 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:23 +0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:36 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:52 +0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 17:55 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 17:19 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 19:09 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-16 23:12 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-16 14:21 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-11-16 18:02 -0500
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-17 17:01 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-18 01:05 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 10:38 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-20 15:38 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-17 09:57 +0100
                Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 +0000
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:56 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:10 -0800
                Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:34 -0800
          Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:32 -0800
            [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 22:50 +0800
              Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:46 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 00:12 +0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:02 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:14 +0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:24 -0800
                Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:27 +0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:49 +0300
      Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:02 -0800
  Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:37 +0300
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 18:07 +0800
    Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 20:15 +0800

csiph-web