Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #434480
| From | Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop |
| Date | 2016-11-09 19:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e8hcocFe451U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nviu6s044o@drn.newsguy.com> <e8btqvF4dmjU1@mid.individual.net> <9-2dne6oiKyRS73FnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@supernews.com> <e8eqgeFph0qU2@mid.individual.net> <e8g4vgF4hf2U1@mid.individual.net> |
Gerhard Hoffmann wrote: > I got two batches (100 pcs. each) of BF862 low noise n-channel jfets, > from two different providers (DigiKey Corp. | Electronic Components > Distributor | United Kingdom Home Page and Mouser Electronics - > Electronic Components Distributor). Both are 100% genuine NXP parts, the > only difference being the origin. One batch is marked 2Aw (w stands for > China) and the other 2Ap (p stands for Hong Kong). > > While they both have the noise floor @100KHz as per the datasheet > (~0.8nV/rtHz), the Chinese parts have significantly larger noise corner > frenquency (~2KHz) compared to the HK parts (<500Hz). Therefore, the > Cninese parts have about twice the noise of the HK parts, @1KHz. Devices > in both batches have essentially the same average Idss of about 16mA. Note that the "Made in..." only says where the final assembly step was done (i.e., where die was moulded in the package), not where the die was made. Otherwise almost all NXP small-signal diodes and BJTs would be "made in Germany." It's very possble that your parts came from different batches from the same waferfab, and some happened to be assembled in HK and the others in mainland China. -- robert
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-25 16:23 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-25 16:52 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-25 18:10 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2016-10-25 18:21 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-25 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-10-25 19:27 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-29 17:14 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-29 11:12 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-29 11:41 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-29 20:02 -0400
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-30 00:47 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-30 10:18 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:24 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-01 19:04 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-02 09:20 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-04 20:40 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-04 14:22 -0700
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-07 18:01 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-07 14:29 -0500
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-08 20:22 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2016-11-09 09:27 +0100
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-09 11:17 -0500
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-11-09 11:27 -0500
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-09 19:46 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 19:48 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2016-11-11 00:09 +0100
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-11-11 09:35 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop JM <dontreplytothis173@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 21:22 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-07 13:22 -0800
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Robert Latest <boblatest@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-08 20:11 +0000
Re: OT: Qualcomm to send NXP to the chop shop Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-29 19:40 -0400
csiph-web