Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #460832

Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available

Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Date 2017-05-18 12:25 -0700
References (3 earlier) <d4267ffa-5753-4941-9259-0cadd78e976b@googlegroups.com> <offa65$us2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6584fc82-ce37-4dd4-97f9-ebed3b3588d3@googlegroups.com> <offih4$1cvo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ofki3h$1b28$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID <e603b9cd-fd7b-4e72-93ac-ea4a66e1e183@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available
From George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 12:28:39 PM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> On a sunny day (Tue, 16 May 2017 19:05:08 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje
> <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in <offih4$1cvo$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
> 
> >On a sunny day (Tue, 16 May 2017 10:01:10 -0700 (PDT)) it happened George
> >Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> wrote in
> ><6584fc82-ce37-4dd4-97f9-ebed3b3588d3@googlegroups.com>:
> 
> >>Hmm not many Top quarks in the universe.  Mostly 'up' and 'down' quarks.  
> >>(protons). Most of the mass in a proton is "binding energy" and not
> >>the mass of the quarks.
> >
> >Yes he did say that.
> >I googled around a bit too after that,
> >
> >
> >>  (This is a bit confusing.. but says the 
> >>same thing.)
> >>
> >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton#Quarks_and_the_mass_of_a_proton
> 
> For the math:
>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism
> 
> I started on it late last night, and got stuck,
> so obviously need to read up on that.
> 
> But whenever somebody says 'field' I think 'screen'.
> That works for everything I know, (electro static, magnetic, RF, .. )so why not for Higgs field.
Hmm, Well you can have scalar fields, like temperature, that has one 
number at each point in space.  And then you can have vector fields, 
like E and B fields which have three numbers (a 3-d vector) at each
point in space.  It could be that the Higgs field is even more complicated.
(but I don't know.  I took group theory a long time ago, but have forgotten
most of it.)  

George h.  
> Some google searching found many people had the same idea (from scifi to more serious views).

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 07:57 +0000
  Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 07:04 -0700
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:39 +0000
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 14:48 +0000
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 08:28 -0700
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:42 +0000
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-16 10:01 -0700
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:05 +0000
              Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 16:28 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 12:51 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:27 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 19:44 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-05-18 16:46 -0500
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-19 19:03 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 17:58 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 07:05 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 04:13 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-20 09:23 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-20 20:55 +0000
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-05-18 12:25 -0700
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 20:04 -0400
                Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-18 21:07 -0700
  Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2017-05-16 10:07 -0500
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 08:31 -0700
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> - 2017-05-16 11:58 -0400
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 09:51 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 19:06 +0000
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
            Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-05-16 19:58 -0700
              Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-05-16 21:30 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-16 20:37 -0400
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-05-16 13:03 -0400
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> - 2017-05-16 11:21 -0700
          Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:50 -0500
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2017-05-16 13:01 -0500
      Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-05-18 10:22 +0200
        Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-18 10:26 +0000
    Re: Tritium decay experiment one more year data now available Jan Panteltje <pNa0nStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-16 16:28 +0000

csiph-web