Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2130916
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism |
| Date | 2016-06-24 10:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dt3chuFjfa1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <27vjmbpeda1demfsvr0ue50n5i1dif2a6n@4ax.com> <dsv0gtFmqs0U1@mid.individual.net> <ncjmmb1c2nb1kd065iion4s4n83okurr3r@4ax.com> <nkgltn$c99$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jalombd2i78b0b3s40l2h28oh4956q517k@4ax.com> |
On 24/06/2016 08:07, Don Martin wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:49:59 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:50:29 -0700, s.knight wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:28:10 +1000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 22/06/2016 13:00, s.knight wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:18:03 -0400, "A. Wolfe" <Wolfe@unc.edu.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/19/2016 10:51 PM, s.knight wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:29:44 -0400, "A. Wolfe" <Wolfe@unc.edu.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It makes no sense to claim that theism is about knowledge, I cannot >>>>>>>> absolutely know that God(s) exist. But this is also true of >>>>>>>> atheism, I cannot know with certainty that there is no God. So, for >>>>>>>> me the most reasonable position is agnostic. I draw upon Pascel's >>>>>>>> argument that since I cannot know, the no risk position is to >>>>>>>> believe in gods. However, I don't like this since I might choose >>>>>>>> the wrong god and draw the wrath of all the other gods. So. >>>>>>>> agnosticism is taking no position and not pissing off any god. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except Agnostism is intellectually retarded. You sit on the fence >>>>>>> and claim the superior high ground and belch out your anthem... >>>>>>> "MAYBE YES, MAYBE NO, DON'T KNOW." You could at least say 42. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You can't know, you can only believe one way or the other. >>>>> >>>>> It has nothing to do with belief. It's all about the evidence. >>>>> There is no evidence a god(s) exist. None. >>>> >>>> There is that which one might charitably call "empirical" testimony. >>>> People having visions, epiphanies, divine visitations. People >>>> experiencing highly unlikely events such as surviving a plane crash. >>>> People whose diseases unexpectedly go into remission. >>>> >>> True. I almost believed in a god the first time I used Preperation >>> H. Wow! Thank you jesus! Amen! >> >> Hallelujah! You are now able to sit on god's right hand! > > Just don't let the old fart wiggle his fingers too much--it could > eliminate the benefit from Preparation H. > God does prostate exams? Wow! This really is one all-singing-all-dancing one stop shopping sort of deity!
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism s.knight <Baawa@Baawa.nut> - 2016-06-22 19:50 -0700
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-23 12:49 +0000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-23 16:12 -0500
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-24 00:32 +0000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-23 18:07 -0400
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-24 10:18 +1000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-24 18:11 -0400
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-25 00:25 +0000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-25 08:40 -0400
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-25 14:23 +0000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-25 18:00 +1000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-24 00:44 +0000
Re: Not Atheism - Not Theism Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-24 15:48 +0000
csiph-web