Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.global-warming > #588308

10 billions tons of CO2 = 50 x 50 square miles of forest

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.global-warming, sci.environment, uk.politics.misc

Show all headers | View raw

R Kym Horsell wrote:

> 
> 
> Is wind power doing its job?

10 billions tons of CO2 annually accounts for
at best 50 x 50 square miles of forest.

Such a staggeringly small area you could drive
around in 4 hours.

The entire CO2 output in last 100 years
would not amount to 500x500 miles square forest.

quack quack!

Saving 10% is about 15 miles x 15 miles square
area of forest. You could cycle around
that in a half a day.

Anti-denialists are finding it difficult
to comprehend that 0.04% CO2 causes
exactly less than 0.04% glow bull wumming.
Even though all the original proposers of glow
bull wumming now retract their outrages pseudo science
alarm claims and accept real science is 100% correct.

Back to alt.global-warming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-05-31 07:22 +0000
  Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction  --  So Why Aren't Temperatures Going Down? AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-05-31 02:38 -0500
    Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction  --  So Why Aren't Temperatures Going Down? Kym Horsell <kymhorsell@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 01:07 -0700
      Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction  --  So Why Aren't Temperatures Going Down? abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2016-05-31 10:47 -0700
      Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction  --  So Why Aren't Temperatures Going Down? AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-05-31 18:45 -0500
      Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction -- So Why Aren't Temperatures Going Down? Sleepalot <sleepalot07@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-01 05:23 +0100
  Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2016-05-31 10:33 +0000
  10 billions tons of CO2 = 50 x 50 square miles of forest 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-05-31 10:36 +0000
  Re: Windppower Responsible For .0016% Atmospheric CO2 Reduction  --  Why Is It Still "Warm"? AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-05-31 20:27 -0500
  Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction Sleepalot <sleepalot07@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-01 05:19 +0100
  Re: windppower responsible for 10% CO2 reduction Paul Aubrin <chu8i443@free.fr> - 2016-06-01 08:45 +0000

csiph-web