Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #2179
| From | D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2.programmer |
| Subject | Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers |
| Date | 2016-01-25 16:03 +0000 |
| Organization | Mac GUI |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1453737958@macgui.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <n7ojt0$v1c$1@news.albasani.net> <dog_cow-1453318623@macgui.com> <n7r7hv$rk7$1@news.albasani.net> <dog_cow-1453506620@macgui.com> <n817pk$d8d$1@news.albasani.net> |
Oliver Schmidt wrote: > > b) 4/2/1/1 - this gives Contiki/IP65/Marina and tcplib with a single > socket the maximum memory and makes socket 2 and 3 "secondary" sockets > for tcplib. > > c) 4/2/x/x - according to my current understanding of the W5100 it is > generally possible to change the memory configuration while sockets > are open as long as it doesn't change memory locations for the already > open sockets. If tests should validate my presumption tcplib could > allow the user to choose between a maximum of two sockets or three > sockets for tcplib. In the former case tcplib would configure 4/2/2/0 > and in the latter case tcplib would configure 4/2/1/1. > > What do you think? Options b and c seem reasonable to me.
Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-09 22:04 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-19 22:20 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-20 18:33 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-20 19:34 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-21 18:20 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-22 23:47 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-24 01:01 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-25 16:03 +0000
Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2016-04-13 05:49 -0700
csiph-web