Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #2179

Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Subject Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers
Date Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:03:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization Mac GUI
Lines 18
Message-ID <dog_cow-1453737958@macgui.com> (permalink)
References <dog_cow-1452377234@macgui.com> <n7mcrm$sah$1@news.albasani.net> <n7ojt0$v1c$1@news.albasani.net> <dog_cow-1453318623@macgui.com> <n7r7hv$rk7$1@news.albasani.net> <dog_cow-1453506620@macgui.com> <n817pk$d8d$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Date Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:03:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ac9e0e4d7dd3957fb97803ee6801bab8"; logging-data="21484"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DIM0O0E2ZUTnzVHm01qZ3"
User-Agent Mac GUI Usenet
In-Reply-To <n817pk$d8d$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock sha1:a5LRbGrWVfjN33FdOVBfP7BZ8j8=
Xref csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:2179

Show key headers only | View raw

Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> 
> b) 4/2/1/1 - this gives Contiki/IP65/Marina and tcplib with a single
> socket the maximum memory and makes socket 2 and 3 "secondary" sockets
> for tcplib.
> 
> c) 4/2/x/x - according to my current understanding of the W5100 it is
> generally possible to change the memory configuration while sockets
> are open as long as it doesn't change memory locations for the already
> open sockets. If tests should validate my presumption tcplib could
> allow the user to choose between a maximum of two sockets or three
> sockets for tcplib. In the former case tcplib would configure 4/2/2/0
> and in the latter case tcplib would configure 4/2/1/1.
> 
> What do you think?

Options b and c seem reasonable to me.

Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-09 22:04 +0000
  Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-19 22:20 +0000
    Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-20 18:33 +0000
      Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-20 19:34 +0000
        Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-21 18:20 +0000
          Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-22 23:47 +0000
            Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt) - 2016-01-24 01:01 +0000
              Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-01-25 16:03 +0000
                Re: New discovery with Uthernet II/W5100 buffers Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2016-04-13 05:49 -0700

csiph-web