Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <dkDZhlC+d25NFA3S@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: // at beginning of line |
| References | (1 earlier) <lnzkm1l3zz.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <af66a354-4fff-49c1-8803-df90208f8d06@24g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <slrniuee5c.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <ABbOoDBc5z5NFAmF@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> <is7nst$vr5$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2011-06-02 11:35 +0100 |
In message <is7nst$vr5$1@dont-email.me>, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> writes >On 06/02/2011 03:40 AM, Chris H wrote: >... >> it. The job of ISO standards is to standardise what the industry is >> doing not go off on flights of fancy which is why virtually no one fully >> implements C99 over a decade on. >> >> In fact if C12 comes out on time C99 will be the standard that never >> was. > >That relies upon the assumption that C12 will be adopted substantially >faster than C99. It can't be slower! >I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if compilers improve their >conformance with C12 during 2013 even more slowly than they improve >their conformance with C99, and that will continue to be the case for >many years thereafter. You would hope that the ISO team learnt their lesson from C99 and only added things to C12 that the *industry* wanted ie things the compiler vendors already wanted to add. And made optional thing the majority were never going to add. However.... I share your pessimism. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
// at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-01 19:44 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-06-01 12:48 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-01 19:55 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-01 20:46 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-01 13:54 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-02 19:34 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-06-02 12:38 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-02 13:13 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-01 20:59 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-01 12:56 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-01 23:06 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-06-02 07:15 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 08:40 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-02 06:15 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 11:35 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-02 07:58 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Lorenzo Villari <vlllnz@tiscali.it> - 2011-06-02 15:18 +0200
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 14:59 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-03 09:09 +1200
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-03 09:40 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-03 20:51 +1200
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-03 06:57 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-03 12:54 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-03 13:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-03 09:42 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-05 17:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-05 12:35 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-06 09:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-06 09:29 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-06-06 14:37 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-03 23:16 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-05 17:28 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-06 22:39 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 23:05 -0500
Re: // at beginning of line Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 13:34 -0400
csiph-web