Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <ABbOoDBc5z5NFAmF@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: // at beginning of line |
| References | <is64rm$qp7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lnzkm1l3zz.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <af66a354-4fff-49c1-8803-df90208f8d06@24g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <slrniuee5c.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| Date | 2011-06-02 08:40 +0100 |
In message <slrniuee5c.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>, Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes >On Thu, 2011-06-02, Malcolm McLean wrote: >It's a somewhat unfortunate choice in general, because it prevents you >from using C89 tools on the code (such as gcc -std=c89). If you don't >have C99 tools available, you become reliant on sloppy tools which >accept C89 + // comments + an unknown other set of extensions (such as >gcc -std=gnu89). The tools that accept C90 + // are not sloppy. On the other hand GCC is. The // was added to C99 because the vast majority of C95 compilers had it. The job of ISO standards is to standardise what the industry is doing not go off on flights of fancy which is why virtually no one fully implements C99 over a decade on. In fact if C12 comes out on time C99 will be the standard that never was. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
// at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-01 19:44 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-06-01 12:48 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-01 19:55 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-01 20:46 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-01 13:54 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Federico <no.adress@nospam.com> - 2011-06-02 19:34 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-06-02 12:38 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-02 13:13 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-01 20:59 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-01 12:56 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-01 23:06 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-06-02 07:15 +0000
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 08:40 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-02 06:15 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 11:35 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-02 07:58 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Lorenzo Villari <vlllnz@tiscali.it> - 2011-06-02 15:18 +0200
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-02 14:59 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-03 09:09 +1200
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-03 09:40 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-03 20:51 +1200
Re: // at beginning of line James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-03 06:57 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-03 12:54 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-03 13:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-03 09:42 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-05 17:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-05 12:35 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-06 09:27 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-06 09:29 -0700
Re: // at beginning of line Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-06-06 14:37 -0400
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-03 23:16 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-05 17:28 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-06 22:39 +0100
Re: // at beginning of line Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 23:05 -0500
Re: // at beginning of line Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 13:34 -0400
csiph-web