Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #434327

Re: unloock a phone

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups alt.2600, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: unloock a phone
Date 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
Message-ID <djlb2jF5st4U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <56D088CF.6970@ix.netcom.com> <56D13D4C.AD@ix.netcom.com> <56D494F2.30C5@ix.netcom.com> <djkgdgFu4f0U1@mid.individual.net> <j38By.21380$ob.2683@fx37.iad>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/03/2016 2:32 PM, benj wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 10:25 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 1/03/2016 5:58 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> you mean to tell me the F.B.I don't know how to unlock a phone?
>>>>>
>>>>> How stupid can they be????
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean...I know the FBI are just a bunch of wet behind the ears
>>>>> stupid guys...but i didn't know
>>>>> they didn't know how to unlock a phone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't they simply do a google search?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or some 3 year old on youtube could should show them how...
>>>>>
>>>>> you mean to tell me the F.B.I don't know how to unlock a phone?
>>>>>
>>>>> i mean...How stupid can they be????
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean I don't get it?
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, if you want to bust out of jail, you do a google search for
>>>>> digging tunnels, right????
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, a FBI guy should be able to go home and
>>>>> ask his 6 year old son "Can you unlock this for me??"
>>>>>
>>>>> Even a 3 year old knows you don't call APPLE!
>>>>
>>>> I suspect what the problem is...the FBI don't know how to use a desktop
>>>> computer.
>>>
>>>
>>> The FBI needs Apple to disarm the feature that erases the content of
>>> iPhones on the 10th wrong password so that agents can gain access to the
>>> phone to learn if there are other sleeper cells or plots.
>>>
>>> When Apple refused the court order, Apple defenders claimed it was
>>> impossible to unlock the phone. In court papers filed last week, Apple
>>> admits that’s not true, but still claims an “unreasonable burden.”
>>>
>>
>> Well, it is unreasonable. Apple's only link to the matter is that some
>> time in the past it manufactured a phone, which was sold to a person.
>> That person then committed an unlawful act, and possibly put some
>> information about the unlawful act, or other unlawful acts, onto the
>> phone.
>>
>> Why should Apple now be forced to use its own resources to aid the FBI?
>> Should anyone capable of assisting the FBI in any respect be forced to
>> do so?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Of course they should. EVERYONE should. If you witnessed something about
> the criminals (any criminals for that matter) and you won't tell then
> for the security of everyone in the country you must be forced to tell
> what you know even if it takes torture. Even if it takes removing all
> your assets and preventing you from ever earning a living. Nothing
> trumps security. There are no rights or freedoms so important that they
> can't be overridden in the name of national security. That is a given.
>
>
Anyway, Apple don't know anything about the criminals that the FBI 
doesn't already know.

Sylvia.

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 09:18 -0800
  Re: unloock a phone Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:58 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:40 -0700
  Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:08 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 14:25 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500
          Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
        Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:27 -0800
          Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:28 -0800
            Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:29 -0800
              Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 14:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:55 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-21 16:46 -0700
  Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 12:08 +1100
    Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 06:10 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 17:37 +0100
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-29 11:24 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 16:50 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-29 19:52 +0000
      Re: unloock a phone Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-02-29 13:14 -0800
        Re: unloock a phone Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2016-02-29 17:19 -0800
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 23:30 +0800
    Re: [OT] Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 17:53 -0500
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:17 +0800
    Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 19:59 -0800
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:19 +0800
        Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 14:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:53 +0800
            Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:16 -0800
              Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:46 +0800
                Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:17 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
                Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 06:38 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:24 -0800
  [OT] Go misc.phone.mobile.iphone "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:58 +0800
  Re: unloock a phone, NO< its about them unlocking everyone's phones tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700

csiph-web