Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #434303
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.2600, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: unloock a phone |
| References | <56D088CF.6970@ix.netcom.com> <56D13D4C.AD@ix.netcom.com> <56D494F2.30C5@ix.netcom.com> <djkgdgFu4f0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <j38By.21380$ob.2683@fx37.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 02/29/2016 10:25 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 1/03/2016 5:58 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> you mean to tell me the F.B.I don't know how to unlock a phone?
>>>>
>>>> How stupid can they be????
>>>>
>>>> I mean...I know the FBI are just a bunch of wet behind the ears
>>>> stupid guys...but i didn't know
>>>> they didn't know how to unlock a phone.
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't they simply do a google search?
>>>>
>>>> Or some 3 year old on youtube could should show them how...
>>>>
>>>> you mean to tell me the F.B.I don't know how to unlock a phone?
>>>>
>>>> i mean...How stupid can they be????
>>>>
>>>> I mean I don't get it?
>>>>
>>>> I mean, if you want to bust out of jail, you do a google search for
>>>> digging tunnels, right????
>>>>
>>>> I mean, a FBI guy should be able to go home and
>>>> ask his 6 year old son "Can you unlock this for me??"
>>>>
>>>> Even a 3 year old knows you don't call APPLE!
>>>
>>> I suspect what the problem is...the FBI don't know how to use a desktop
>>> computer.
>>
>>
>> The FBI needs Apple to disarm the feature that erases the content of
>> iPhones on the 10th wrong password so that agents can gain access to the
>> phone to learn if there are other sleeper cells or plots.
>>
>> When Apple refused the court order, Apple defenders claimed it was
>> impossible to unlock the phone. In court papers filed last week, Apple
>> admits that’s not true, but still claims an “unreasonable burden.”
>>
>
> Well, it is unreasonable. Apple's only link to the matter is that some
> time in the past it manufactured a phone, which was sold to a person.
> That person then committed an unlawful act, and possibly put some
> information about the unlawful act, or other unlawful acts, onto the phone.
>
> Why should Apple now be forced to use its own resources to aid the FBI?
> Should anyone capable of assisting the FBI in any respect be forced to
> do so?
>
> Sylvia.
Of course they should. EVERYONE should. If you witnessed something about
the criminals (any criminals for that matter) and you won't tell then
for the security of everyone in the country you must be forced to tell
what you know even if it takes torture. Even if it takes removing all
your assets and preventing you from ever earning a living. Nothing
trumps security. There are no rights or freedoms so important that they
can't be overridden in the name of national security. That is a given.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 09:18 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:58 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:40 -0700
Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:08 -0800
Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 14:25 +1100
Re: unloock a phone benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500
Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:27 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:28 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:29 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 14:40 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:55 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 -0800
Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-21 16:46 -0700
Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 12:08 +1100
Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 06:10 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 17:37 +0100
Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-29 11:24 +1100
Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 16:50 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-29 19:52 +0000
Re: unloock a phone Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-02-29 13:14 -0800
Re: unloock a phone Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2016-02-29 17:19 -0800
[OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 23:30 +0800
Re: [OT] Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 17:53 -0500
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:17 +0800
Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 19:59 -0800
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:19 +0800
Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 14:44 -0800
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:53 +0800
Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:16 -0800
Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:46 +0800
Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:17 -0800
Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 06:38 -0800
Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:24 -0800
[OT] Go misc.phone.mobile.iphone "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:58 +0800
Re: unloock a phone, NO< its about them unlocking everyone's phones tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700
csiph-web