Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #157495
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: recommended free email? |
| Date | 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <dgkcp4Fb3leU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <n7vkr3$e92$1@news.albasani.net> <dghf0lFlginU1@mid.individual.net> <n816n2$bfn$1@news.albasani.net> <dgjovfF8t5qU1@mid.individual.net> <n82u0u$in9$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 2016-01-24, David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24/01/2016 10:56, Huge wrote:
>> On 2016-01-24, David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2016 13:54, Huge wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-23, David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [17 lines snipped]
>>>>
>>>>> I use GMAIL for a number of reasons....
>>>>
>>>> [12 lines snipped]
>>>>
>>>>> .. the BAD things...
>>>>>
>>>>> 6) The address book does not integrate with outlook. The integration
>>>>> tools are naff.
>>>>
>>>> 7) and the showstopper. Google data mines your email.
>>>>
>>> It always has, and from what I remember it said from day one that was
>>> how it would fund the service. That is it would mine your data so it
>>> could target you with appropriate adds. I find the targeted adds that
>>> result from my e-mail being mined some what innocuous.
>>>
>>> Those that result from clicking on links on web sites bother me more. I
>>> looked at a Viking River Cruise and get pictures of Budapest on every
>>> web page, even though I have already had a Viking cruise there....
>>
>> I run Ghostery and AdBlock+. Adverts? What adverts?
>>
> I found AddBlock+ seemed to cause several modern sites to fail to load.
There's the odd site that pops up something along the lines of "You're
running AdBlock so we're not showing you our site". To which my response
is "Your loss. Bye."
Other Ad blockers are available.
--
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 24th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3182
I don't have an attitude problem.
If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
Re: recommended free email? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:34 +1100
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:00 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:22 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-28 11:46 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:36 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-31 11:03 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 17:29 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 09:25 +0000
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:31 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 13:54 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 14:58 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 15:35 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 16:04 +0000
Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:42 +0000
Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:39 -0500
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:43 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 10:56 +0000
Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:27 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:53 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-25 08:22 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:25 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 13:32 +0100
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:21 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-25 14:18 +0000
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:54 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:56 -0600
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:10 -0800
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:32 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:15 -0600
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 10:33 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000
Re: recommended free email? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-06 20:20 +0300
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:50 +0000
Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:06 -0800
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 16:13 -0600
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:32 -0600
Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:20 -0600
Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 -0500
Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 15:45 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:24 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:11 -0600
Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:42 +0000
csiph-web