Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1688
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-01-11 22:46 -0800 |
| References | <7b970e11-f2f4-4b09-a622-58112e60e40f@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8i1ke81loqvm337hhpgfi89rimei9co2kf@4ax.com> <87zk0lev6j.fsf@wistly.net> <kinke8tcv290puntl1tddc3top897dr75f@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <df7b216a-5eb6-4f21-bb07-fb1a461ebbb0@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? |
| From | andymhancock@gmail.com |
On Monday, January 7, 2013 12:39:47 AM UTC-5, Char Jackson wrote: >On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:41:24 -0600, Carson Chittom ><carson@wistlyDOTnet> wrote: >>Char Jackson <none@noneDOTinvalid> writes: >>>On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:51:53 -0800 (PST), AndyHancock wrote: >>>> How reliable is the zip that is native to Windows 7? >>> >>> It's fine, as far as it goes. The zip spec has been around for a >>> long time and is well known, but it's subject to corruption from >>> outside factors. Tools like Quickpar address those weaknesses, >>> whether for zip files or any other type of digital file. >> >> In my experience the disk is more likely to be a problem than the >> file--particularly optical disks. > > Optical disc issues are included in what I said above. If the > optical disc develops a problem, it's still the files that are > affected. Tools like Quickpar will let you know whether the files > are ok, and if not, whether they can be repaired. > >> It's also worth mentioning the obvious that for anything you really >> care about, you should back it up in more than one place--and every >> so often, you should actually try to restore--in a non-emergency >> way--from the backups you have, to make sure they really are >> backups and not random bits. > > If you use a tool like Quickpar, (I feel like I'm preaching by now, > but it's the most widely used and therefore the best example), you > don't have to actually unzip anything. You can just run an integrity > check and be done with it. Thanks, Carson, Char. Quickpar looks very interesting. About replicating my backups, I don't really have more than one abode to keep two geographically separate items. A fire will wipe out everything :( . Point well taken about testing the backup, and how easy Quickpar makes it. Tar+gzip allows an actual comparison with the unarchived source files, and zip also has a command line switch for integrity checking.
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:51 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2013-01-06 17:25 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Carson Chittom <carson@wistly.net> - 2013-01-06 17:41 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2013-01-06 23:39 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-11 22:46 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-12 03:33 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-19 23:29 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-20 08:10 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2013-01-20 11:33 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? franklin.macintosh@gmail.com - 2013-01-25 22:23 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-06 23:57 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-07 01:24 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-11 23:04 -0800
csiph-web