Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1673
| From | Carson Chittom <carson@wistly.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compression, comp.os.ms-windows.misc |
| Subject | Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? |
| Date | 2013-01-06 17:41 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87zk0lev6j.fsf@wistly.net> (permalink) |
| References | <7b970e11-f2f4-4b09-a622-58112e60e40f@d10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8i1ke81loqvm337hhpgfi89rimei9co2kf@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> writes: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:51:53 -0800 (PST), AndyHancock > <andymhancock@gmail.com> wrote: > >>There have been times in the past when a zip file I created was >>corrupt (or became corrupt somehow). I encountered this either using >>WinZip or command-line zip, possibly in old Unix environments. To me, >>there is a risk in relying solely on zip archives and deleting the >>original unzipped files. The risk isn't only in losing one file that >>is corrupt -- any corruption anywhere in the entire archive could >>render all the files therein inaccessible. Hence, the risk increases >>with the size of the archive. > > If you're concerned with the integrity of any data files, zip or otherwise, > one way to get peace of mind is to use Quickpar to create a recovery set. > Normally, 10% is a nice round number to use, but feel free to adjust the > settings as you see fit. With a Quickpar recovery set, not only can you know > for sure whether your data is intact, but if it's damaged you can repair it. > > <http://www.quickpar.org.uk/> > >>How reliable is the zip that is native to Windows 7? > > It's fine, as far as it goes. The zip spec has been around for a long time > and is well known, but it's subject to corruption from outside factors. > Tools like Quickpar address those weaknesses, whether for zip files or any > other type of digital file. In my experience the disk is more likely to be a problem than the file--particularly optical disks. It's also worth mentioning the obvious that for anything you really care about, you should back it up in more than one place--and every so often, you should actually try to restore--in a non-emergency way--from the backups you have, to make sure they really are backups and not random bits.
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:51 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2013-01-06 17:25 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Carson Chittom <carson@wistly.net> - 2013-01-06 17:41 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2013-01-06 23:39 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-11 22:46 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2013-01-12 03:33 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-19 23:29 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-20 08:10 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2013-01-20 11:33 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? franklin.macintosh@gmail.com - 2013-01-25 22:23 -0800
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-06 23:57 +0000
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2013-01-07 01:24 -0600
Re: How reliable is zipping in Windows 7 Explorer? andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-01-11 23:04 -0800
csiph-web