Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #471528
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The false premises of current theories |
| Date | 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pnbbgl$18tl$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <341a3d29-9690-45e7-af31-3ce6d819dded@googlegroups.com> <pn8sjv$19n6$2@gioia.aioe.org> <b0071afe-e11e-4467-8cbc-fab13e046d43@googlegroups.com> <pnb34m$pb2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0eb7cadf-c271-4f89-b8be-83c83744d961@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 9:08:50 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:05:07 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:51:44 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of >>>>>>>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false >>>>>>>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory >>>>>>>>> for all the forces >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories: >>>>>>>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will >>>>>>>>> project a field throughout space >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is incorrect. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a woodworker....You are not qualified. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you are a chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me. >>>>>> Therefore you are unqualified. >>>>> >>>>> Except that I don’t make unsupported statements. >>>> >>>> Of course you do. You always refer to your own theory. Referring to your >>>> own theory is not a supporting statement of your theory. >>> >>> Nothing wrong with that when my theory is superior. >>> >>>> >>>> Providing calculated predictions WOULD be a supporting statement because >>>> the numbers could be checked against measurement. But you haven’t provided >>>> those. >>>> >>>> You are an unqualified chemical engineer trying to pretend to do physics. >>> >>> I got 2 patents and I developed numerous products for the auto and >>> construction industries. >> >> This does not make you qualified to do physics. >> You should be satisfied with your industrial accomplishments and not >> pretend to be qualified as a physicist. > > I didn’t pretend--I developed Model Mechanics a complete theory of the universe. You are not qualified to develop a physical theory. You have no idea how to do that properly and you don’t know even basic physics. Pretending to be a doctor doesn’t make you a doctor. Pretending to be a lawyer doesn’t make you a lawyer. Pretending to be a physicist doesn’t make you a physicist. You are a retired chemical engineer with some industrial accomplishments. You are not a qualified physicist. > >> >>> What have you got?....NOTHING, except wasting your time cruising the >>> internet and criticizing any body who has new ideas. >> >> Oh, I’ve got plenty, bub. Thanks very much. I’m not retired. >> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and virtual particles in the form of bosons will pop in and out of this >>>>>>>>> field. These bosons will act as force messengers to affect an appropriate >>>>>>>>> force to the interacting object. The force messengers for all the forces >>>>>>>>> can be summarized as follows: >>>>>>>>> The strong force messengers are the gluons. The existence of gluon has >>>>>>>>> not been found experimentally. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The force messengers for the electroweak force are: W+, W- and Z0. These >>>>>>>>> force messengers have been found experimentally. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The force messengers for the electromagnetic force are the photons. The >>>>>>>>> virtual photons have been found experimentally. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The force messengers for gravity are the gravitons. Graviton has not been >>>>>>>>> found experimentally. In fact, the notion of gravitons for the force of >>>>>>>>> gravity has been a total failure mathematically. This means that there is >>>>>>>>> no valid theory of quantum gravity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Einstein’s premise of gravity is simply that the interacting objects >>>>>>>>> follow the curvature of space-time. There is no physical cause of gravity >>>>>>>>> in Einstein’s description. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In other words, GRT is merely a mathematical description of the paths >>>>>>>>> followed by the interacting objects. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I came to the conclusion that there is one physical model of our universe >>>>>>>>> that can replace these divergent false premises of GRT and QFT. The >>>>>>>>> result of an intense search for such physical model for the past twenty >>>>>>>>> years is: Model Mechanics. Model Mechanics posits that all the particles, >>>>>>>>> all the forces and all the processes of nature are the result of >>>>>>>>> different absolute motions of the fundamental S-Particles in a structured >>>>>>>>> and elastic ether called the E-Matrix. The detailed description of Model >>>>>>>>> Mechanics is available in Chapter 3 of my book in the following link: >>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The main feature of Model Mechanics are as follows: >>>>>>>>> It offers a realistic origin of the universe. >>>>>>>>> It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. >>>>>>>>> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. >>>>>>>>> It provides a mechanism to amalgamate all the forces of nature. >>>>>>>>> It can be validated experimentally. >>>>>>>>> It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). >>>>>>>>> It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) >>>>>>>>> It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of >>>>>>>>> Relativity as subsets. >>>>>>>>> It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. >>>>>>>>> It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. >>>>>>>>> It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. >>>>>>>>> It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. >>>>>>>>> It explains the structures of atoms. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 06:57 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 07:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:14 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 14:51 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:24 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:09 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:08 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 07:54 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 13:40 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:26 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:36 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:47 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:26 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-15 14:39 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:14 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 02:16 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-16 10:18 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:11 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-18 22:00 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:23 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 15:26 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:13 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:34 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:35 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-15 08:24 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 21:26 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-14 19:02 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:39 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:38 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:29 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:30 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:42 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 17:12 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:00 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 19:07 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 19:21 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:31 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 13:08 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 20:15 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 16:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-12 16:30 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:25 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-10 10:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 19:23 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:07 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:21 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:30 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:06 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 04:39 +0200
Re: The false premises of current theories consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 21:16 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 10:48 +0200
csiph-web