Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2028089

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 20-December-2015 5:01 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:55:41 -0600, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by Christopher A. Lee
> <c.lee@fairpoint.net>:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:22:05 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>>
>>>> On 18-December-2015 4:29 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16-December-2015 4:47 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
>>>>>>>>> by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>>>>>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>>>>>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>>>>>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>>>>>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>>>>>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>>>>>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>>>>>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>>>>>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>>>>>>>> into consideration.
>>>>>>> How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
>>>>>>> non-event, even strong atheism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
>>>>>>> UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
>>>>>> those are all beliefs
>> A stupid lie.
>>
>> A falsifiable conclusion is  not a belief - it's the  only way to
>> treat ridiculous claims.
>>
>> These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
>> other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
>> Christians.
>>
>>>>>>> And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
>>>>>>> missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
>>>>>>> is obvious.
>>>>>> you're confusing evidence with proof
>> Another stupid lie.
>>
>>>>> No, he's not.
>>>> yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
>>>> evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
>>>> evidence that will create proof
>> So provide some of it, liar.
>>
>> These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
>>
>> They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
>> that has been debunked over and over again.
>>
>>> Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
>>> everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
>>> available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
>>> evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
>>> preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
>>> such evidence has been presented.
>> The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
>> over and over again.
>>
>>>> http://ausnet.info/evidence
>>> Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
>>> same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
>>> much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
>>> "reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
>>> something about the subject:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
>>>
>>>>>    But *you* are confusing evidence with
>>>>> anecdote.
>> It's a theist doing what theists do.
> Not all theists are like him.

you don't know what I am

>   I've known many who accept
> science in scientific fields while still believing in a
> deity, but they're rational enough to not usually post their
> beliefs in Usenet, at least not in groups dedicated to
> scientific investigation such as sci.skeptic.

I replied to a post by YOU in alt.agnosticism. so one might just as well 
ask why are you posting your scientific stuff in alt.agnosticism?

>    They know that
> science doesn't deal with unsupported belief regarding
> things which are inherently not susceptible to scientific
> investigation. It's a self-selective process, and the losers
> (multiple meanings) post here.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

www.thescienceforum.com/ is a pussy forum you might love mur@. - 2015-12-14 00:52 -0500
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-15 03:19 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-15 10:25 -0700
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-17 00:10 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:28 -0700
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 12:22 -0600
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-15 11:47 -0600
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-17 20:24 +1100
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:29 -0700
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 11:38 -0600
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:37 +1100
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:32 +1100
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-18 11:22 -0700
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-18 12:55 -0600
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:50 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:01 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:24 +1100
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:35 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:11 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:23 +1100

csiph-web