Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2027992

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:55:41 -0600, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Christopher A. Lee
<c.lee@fairpoint.net>:

>On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:22:05 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
>>in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>
>>>On 18-December-2015 4:29 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 16-December-2015 4:47 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
>>>>>>>> by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>>>>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>>>>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>>>>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>>>>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>>>>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>>>>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>>>>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>>>>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>>>>>>> into consideration.
>>>>>> How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
>>>>>> non-event, even strong atheism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
>>>>>> UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
>>>>> those are all beliefs
>
>A stupid lie.
>
>A falsifiable conclusion is  not a belief - it's the  only way to
>treat ridiculous claims.
>
>These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
>other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
>Christians.
>
>>>>>> And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
>>>>>> missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
>>>>>> is obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> you're confusing evidence with proof
>
>Another stupid lie.
>
>>>> No, he's not.
>>
>>>yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already 
>>>evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie. 
>>>evidence that will create proof
>
>So provide some of it, liar.
>
>These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
>
>They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
>that has been debunked over and over again.
>
>>Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
>>everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
>>available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
>>evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
>>preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
>>such evidence has been presented.
>
>The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
>over and over again.
>
>>>http://ausnet.info/evidence
>>
>>Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
>>same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
>>much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
>>"reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
>>something about the subject:
>>
>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
>>
>>>>   But *you* are confusing evidence with
>>>> anecdote.

>It's a theist doing what theists do.

Not all theists are like him. I've known many who accept
science in scientific fields while still believing in a
deity, but they're rational enough to not usually post their
beliefs in Usenet, at least not in groups dedicated to
scientific investigation such as sci.skeptic. They know that
science doesn't deal with unsupported belief regarding
things which are inherently not susceptible to scientific
investigation. It's a self-selective process, and the losers
(multiple meanings) post here.
-- 

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

www.thescienceforum.com/ is a pussy forum you might love mur@. - 2015-12-14 00:52 -0500
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-15 03:19 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-15 10:25 -0700
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-17 00:10 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:28 -0700
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 12:22 -0600
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-15 11:47 -0600
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-17 20:24 +1100
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:29 -0700
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 11:38 -0600
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:37 +1100
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:32 +1100
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-18 11:22 -0700
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-18 12:55 -0600
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:50 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:01 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:24 +1100
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:35 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:11 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:23 +1100

csiph-web