Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330002
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Date | 2015-10-31 23:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d9l07sF67aU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <n136bl$glh$1@dont-email.me> <d9kliiFs39fU1@mid.individual.net> <n137sq$oom$1@dont-email.me> <d9kn95Fshg0U1@mid.individual.net> <n13fnc$oqh$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 23:37:36 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Lloyd Parsons wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:23:58 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 20:57:45 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:42:57 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> [snips] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:48:52 -0700, -hh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kelsey B writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Absolutely! Couple that with the fact it will also work with >>>>>>>>>> any of the printers and scanners that store is selling too. >>>>>>>>>> Well, actually any printer/scanner that anyone is selling. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Note the implicit kowtowing to the corporate master here. No >>>>>>>>> mention of *existing* hardware, just hardware *for sale*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Existing hardware had to have had come from somewhere at some >>>>>>>> point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, and? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, putting your claims to practice, feel free to tell us what >>>>>>>> hardware you're running, since it obviously has never broken down >>>>>>>> or had had any other reason to ever have paid money to have been >>>>>>>> replaced. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What the thundering fuck are you blabbering about? Are you >>>>>>> delusional enough to consider the user _choosing_ to upgrade his >>>>>>> hardware, and the user being _forced_ to upgrade it because some >>>>>>> corporate jackass both controls the driver and refuses to update >>>>>>> it, >>>>>>> as being equivalent? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You really *are* a slave of the corporate masters, aren't you? Do >>>>>>> they allow you *any* free will? >>>>>> >>>>>> You are an idiot. Drivers will be updated for Windows first and >>>>>> all others after that. That assumes that they think there are >>>>>> enough of whatever is out there to make it worthwhile. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Interesting idiocy you show here. >>>>> >>>>> Drivers for *existing* hardware are all too often *not* updated. >>>>> Meaning you can't use the otherwise fine working peripheral anymore. >>>> >>>> Most drivers are updated except for very old gear. You still using >>>> that Okidata 392?? >>>> >>>> >>> "Most drivers" is not good enough >> >> Bullshit Peter. You can't expect any mfg to support everything they've >> made since day 1. That is unrealistic and very stupid. >> >> > Linux can. And does. It is neither unrealistic nor stupid While Linux might in some instances, you cannot make the case that all the drivers from whenever still work on Linux. That is pure bullshit. And in many cases those Linux drivers are minimalistic ones to begin with. -- Lloyd
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 00:27 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 21:36 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 01:42 +0000
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:07 +0200
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:29 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:09 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 03:58 +0200
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-11 22:22 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 21:01 -0700
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-12 00:16 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:01 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:00 -0700
PLOOPP!!! SPLASH!!! AAAAHHHHHHH!!!! FLUSH!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:48 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 07:06 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-12 08:36 -0300
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:57 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:56 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:42 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 14:39 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:51 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:55 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:59 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:56 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:26 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:06 -0500
Find one for sale in the stores, Turdv. Linux left the shelf years ago. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:03 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:09 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:39 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:14 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:05 +0200
Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 04:30 -0700
Re: Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:21 +0000
Re: Why this troll is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:39 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 14:00 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:19 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:18 -0500
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:08 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 06:55 -0500
Typical Turdv response. A total LUSER! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:48 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:20 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-16 23:03 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 23:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:33 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:23 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:39 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:33 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 06:02 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 08:06 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 08:54 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 12:00 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 12:52 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 19:17 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 21:06 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:25 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-21 09:30 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:21 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:25 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-24 09:47 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 11:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 16:36 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 11:57 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 17:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:41 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:11 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:21 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:05 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 07:35 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 08:42 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 09:00 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:12 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 20:57 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:10 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:23 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:13 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:41 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 00:43 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:45 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:52 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:47 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:46 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:59 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:54 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:53 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 02:04 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 18:17 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:45 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:39 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:57 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 20:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:07 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 20:47 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-01 22:37 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 17:42 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:14 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:18 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:29 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:33 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:39 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:58 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:35 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 07:56 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:47 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:21 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:42 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:58 +0100
You're a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:12 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-02 00:09 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:18 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:34 -0700
No it doesn't, moron. You are a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:11 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0600
Go lick your urinals, dog. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:57 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:43 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:07 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:28 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:50 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:31 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:26 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:14 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:02 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 19:01 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:40 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:41 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:57 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 10:38 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:41 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 16:07 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:16 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 11:29 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:28 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:28 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-31 18:27 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:17 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 08:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 12:22 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-31 17:26 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:32 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:14 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 15:09 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:24 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:35 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:43 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:11 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 13:03 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:32 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:42 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:27 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:49 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 10:38 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 16:44 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-26 16:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:51 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-27 04:25 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-27 07:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 13:37 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 10:29 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:49 -0700
LINUX SUCKS AND SO DO YOU. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:05 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 11:54 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:08 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-24 20:36 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:39 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:38 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:03 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:04 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-15 22:13 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 -0700
Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:26 -0700
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:54 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 06:57 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:23 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:21 -0700
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:26 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:56 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-16 09:41 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:31 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:31 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:30 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:22 -0700
csiph-web