Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #422803
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. |
| Date | 2015-09-14 10:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d5oah9Fgba8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <20150912a@crcomp.net> <XnsA513A6F06609Fmelchizedek@216.166.97.131> <d5kn6uFijpuU1@mid.individual.net> <XnsA51475445348Cmelchizedek@216.166.97.131> <17fa8711-d67d-4604-adf4-6a6f12f8bfdf@googlegroups.com> |
Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote: >On Sunday, 13 September 2015 16:31:27 UTC+1, Cryptoengineer wrote: >> 'Orbital Height' is the lowest altitude at which something can be in >> a stable, longlasting orbit. Around the Earth, and most planets, >> atmospheric drag is the limiting factor - the lowest Earth satellites >> are about 100 miles up. > >IIRC, every supply mission to the International Space Station, >or many of them, also has a job of pushing the station back up, >since atmospheric drag brings it down. I don't know what the >math is on how long until it crashes, if they don't do that, >several times a year (?) > >So, does that count as "longlasting"? If I recall, the original plan for the space shuttle was that the second mission would be to push Skylab into a higher orbit. But there were bureaucratic delays and Skylab was gone before the shuttle arrived. First mission, of course, was to reach orbit and survive re-entry. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Red Thunder, here we come! Joe Bernstein <joe@sfbooks.com> - 2015-09-11 21:01 -0700
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2015-09-12 17:01 +0000
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:24 -0500
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! Don Kuenz <garbage@crcomp.net> - 2015-09-12 22:31 +0000
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 21:43 -0500
YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-09-13 01:33 -0600
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-13 03:51 -0400
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2015-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:56 -0500
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2015-09-20 20:18 -0700
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2015-09-22 05:46 +0000
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:04 -0400
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 10:31 -0500
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. "Michael R N Dolbear" <me@privacy.net> - 2015-09-13 19:41 +0100
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 21:15 -0500
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 06:05 -0400
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-09-14 18:47 -0700
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> - 2015-09-13 21:49 -0700
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-09-14 10:21 -0600
Re: YASID: Moon in a very low orbit. nebusj-@-rpi-.edu (Joseph Nebus) - 2015-09-14 20:26 +0000
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-09-14 11:43 +0800
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 06:16 -0400
Re: Red Thunder, here we come! "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-09-14 06:24 -0400
csiph-web