Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.lisp > #32950
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-05-24 10:40 -0700 |
| References | (1 earlier) <m2a7gez0d0.fsf@despina.home> <barmar-6B8998.11044625042019@reader443.eternal-september.org> <m21s1qyp7t.fsf@despina.home> <240eddc7-e436-40a6-9099-52cabdfcf163@googlegroups.com> <m2h89l3wpc.fsf@despina.home> |
| Message-ID | <d4d07459-b2f8-4abb-858e-e979ac91e8fe@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP |
| From | taruss@google.com |
On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 10:30:28 AM UTC-7, informatimago wrote: > > Certainly a better metric would be in order. But in anycase, by > definition there will be fewer multi-user computers than single-user > computers. I might quibble that this is not necessarily axiomatic. Certainly in the early history of computing there were more multi-user computers. But enough of pedantry. Especially if you count smart phones as computers. > The business value of companies like Google is in reducing the number of > computers they need to use to serve the 7 billion potential users. > > The business value of companies like Apple or Samsung is to increase the > number of hand-held computers the sell to the 7 billion potential users. > > Apple will never make a iUberPhone! "Press a button, and some random > iPhone will be brought to your position in less than five minutes so you > make your call or send you tweet!" Anybody? This sounds like a great premise for an April 1st post. Especially since one could work autonomous drone delivery of the phones into it. Maybe I'll try writing that next year...
Back to comp.lang.lisp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Buffer Overflow in LISP yara.huss.113@gmail.com - 2019-04-25 03:52 -0700
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP shcv@sdf.org - 2019-04-25 09:21 -0400
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-04-25 15:21 +0200
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-04-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-04-25 19:22 +0200
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2019-04-28 08:34 +0000
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-04-29 12:31 -0400
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP a.daniel.eliason@gmail.com - 2019-05-23 08:35 -0700
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Kaz Kylheku <847-115-0292@kylheku.com> - 2019-05-23 17:02 +0000
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2019-05-30 15:50 -0400
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-05-23 19:30 +0200
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP taruss@google.com - 2019-05-24 10:40 -0700
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-05-24 10:45 -0700
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-05-24 23:27 +0200
[OT] was: Buffer Overflow in LISP Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-24 22:46 +0100
Re: [OT] was: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-05-25 01:00 +0200
Re: [OT] was: Buffer Overflow in LISP Kaz Kylheku <847-115-0292@kylheku.com> - 2019-05-24 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] was: Buffer Overflow in LISP Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-05-25 01:35 +0100
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Jason Cornez <jcornez@ravenpack.com> - 2019-05-29 16:10 +0200
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2019-05-29 20:25 +0200
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Vladimir Sedach <vsedach@oneofus.la> - 2019-09-22 21:26 -0700
Re: Buffer Overflow in LISP Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-09-23 00:45 -0400
csiph-web