Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #74187

Re: test only

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:58:01 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>> I don't believe you, its entirely the steaming turd
>>>>> you have dropped countless times before
>
>>>>> And that's what grok says too
>>>>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_128a3e35-caaa-4f22-88a9-347c7e909777
>
>>>> I had GROK do it's version
>
>>> You need to show us the question you asked it and
>>> you need to show the response the same way I do
>>> so we can see that grok actually said it and that
>>> you didn't make it up
>
>> I showed the link you snipped it out
>
>More of your pathological lies
>
>> <https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_e5ecc77c-554c-4e25-a335-361d4aee3ade>
>
>That's not what you claimed grok said, you pathological liar
>
>What you previously claimed grok said was actually what you
>ASKED grok, not what grok told you, you pathologial liar
>
>And grok pissed on your stupid claim about what was meant
>by religion at that time, rubbing your stupid claim in the FACT
>that the discussion about what should be in the constitution
>explicitly mentioned jews and 'mahomens'
>
>And pissed on your stupid claim  that there has been any
>change to the constitution that requires a S128 referendum
>
>And pisses on your stupid claim that
>the preamble has ANY effect on S116
>
>> In Australia according to my legal advice from a professor at law
>
>Who you never named, so you are clearly lying again, you pathological liar
>
><reams of YOUR stupid repeated shit flushed where it belongs>
>
I just posted Groks conclusion which you would of seen if you scrolled
down to..
here
Bottom line
The document correctly identifies the Christian cultural and legal
matrix in which the Constitution was framed, the deliberate insertion
of the Almighty God clause, Downer’s contemporaneous characterisation,
and the High Court’s later expansive approach to “religion.” It then
draws the strong originalist conclusion that any move beyond the
framers’ Christian denominational understanding of “religion,” or any
analogous change in constitutional symbolism, requires s 128 approval
and cannot validly be effected by judicial or ordinary legislative
action. That is a coherent position within originalist theory. It is
not the position the High Court has adopted, nor the understanding
that has governed Australian public law and practice for decades. The
gap between the two is precisely the ongoing debate over whether the
Constitution is to be read according to its original public meaning
until the people change it, or whether its application may evolve with
changed social conditions without formal amendment.
--
Petzl
In a democracy of course you always get a choice
Do you want to be governed by the red or by the blue
it’s entirely up to you
Do you want to be patronized or condescended to, by liars or by crooks
you get to choose.
Would you prefer your fundamental values to be insulted or ignored by
con-men or by charlatans
In short do you want your influence to be zero or nil
and when would you like to be listened to, never or not at all, it’s
your choice
Do you want, some more choices.
Take-it-or-leave-it
Now there’s a real choice
we have proportional voting in Australia USE IT
I’d be happy with any kind of representation wouldn't you

I would like to see a new government and part of me doesn't’give a
damn who’s in it as long as it doesn't’include anybody from the Labor,
Liberal or Green party organizations that show itself to be without
shame or principle

All spineless and authoritarian both cowardly and war mongering at the
same time

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 13:45 +1000
  Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 17:03 +1000
    Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 20:37 +1000
      Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 05:37 +1000
        Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 06:06 +1000
          Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 08:10 +1000
            Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 09:25 +1000
              Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 11:53 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 13:37 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 15:51 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 20:22 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 04:56 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 08:23 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 08:58 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 11:09 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 09:37 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 10:53 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 13:42 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 17:43 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 18:30 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 18:38 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 19:07 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 05:50 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 07:13 +1000
                Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 19:35 +1000
      Re: test only Newsmaster <newsmaster@ausics.net> - 2026-09-11 09:15 +1000
        Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 09:47 +1000

csiph-web