Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #37102
| From | Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Why are there throw() following the delete[]? |
| Date | 2015-07-16 11:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d0paadFh3ueU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20afc0b3-d071-4681-8bea-de40158a7ff0@googlegroups.com> <d0o824FqegtU5@mid.individual.net> <85288470-2662-4de8-856a-7884686c68cb@googlegroups.com> |
On 2015-07-16 01:36, fl wrote: > On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 4:18:40 PM UTC-7, Ian Collins wrote: >> fl wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When I search delete description for C++, I find the following: >>> >>> ordinary (1) >>> void operator delete[] (void* ptr) throw(); >>> nothrow (2) >>> void operator delete[] (void* ptr, const std::nothrow_t& nothrow_constant) throw(); >>> placement (3) >>> void operator delete[] (void* ptr, void* voidptr2) throw(); >>> >> <snip> >>> >>> I am puzzled about: >>> >>> 1. In the normal use of delete[], I never see the throw() following it; >>> 2. The description does not mention about throw() although the upper part >>> has throw() >> >> These describe the operators as defined in <new>. The throw() (noexcept >> in modern C++) is telling you that the operators will not throw. >> >> You don't include the throw() when you use operator delete, it is only >> appropriate in the declaration. >> >> > Thanks. As you said, it is a declaration. Good. > As I am a newbie to C++, I still feel it is different from a normal > declaration. What role of the throw() in the declaration? > I hope your further explanation can teach me more on this. > The throw-part lists the execeptions the function (or operator) is allowed to throw. Here the list is empty, meaning that it throws no exceptions. Bo Persson
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why are there throw() following the delete[]? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 16:05 -0700
Re: Why are there throw() following the delete[]? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:18 +1200
Re: Why are there throw() following the delete[]? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 16:36 -0700
Re: Why are there throw() following the delete[]? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:44 +1200
Re: Why are there throw() following the delete[]? Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2015-07-16 11:03 +0200
csiph-web