Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| References | (8 earlier) <020620181631151818%nospam@nospam.invalid> <fngdcvF8g7pU1@mid.individual.net> <pf15eo.80s.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <fnipq8Fm0isU3@mid.individual.net> <pf1ktd.3co.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
| Subject | Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions |
| Message-ID | <d04d7caf6c9ca8e63482b5f7d1065e12@haph.org> (permalink) |
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:42 -0400 |
| Newsgroups | alt.test, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In article <pf1ktd.3co.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 6/3/18 7:59 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote: > > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >> On 6/2/18 1:31 PM, nospam wrote: > > >>> In article <fngcqiF8a4tU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit > > >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>>>>> I'll stick to the one 90% of the population uses. More programs > > >>>>>>>> available > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> yep > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> (no I won't say "apps", those are for phones), > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> app is short for application, a term that dates back at least to the > > >>>>>>> 80s, probably even earlier > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Right. It is the term Apple has used since AT LEAST the start of the Mac. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Who cares!? We're talking about the *real* world! (Just kidding!) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> FWIW, I only first encountered the term for mobile devices, yes > > >>>>> Apples'. OTOH, 'applet' was known (to me) well before that time. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> You only encountered it with mobile devices so you think that means the > > >>>> term was not used... and more than that want to restrict how others use > > >>>> the term! > > >>>> > > >>>> Why? > > >>> > > >>> <https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2011/10/14/the-rise-of-the-app/> > > >>> But, unlike smartphones and tablets, app isnšt new. According to the > > >>> OED?s historical entry for the word, app as a shortening of > > >>> application (as in application program) first found its way into > > >>> print in the 1980s. Back then it was mainly a colloquial term used in > > >>> computing circles: the OED?s early quotations for it come from such > > >>> computing trade publications as Info World and Dr. Dobbšs Journal. It > > >>> often appeared not by itself but as part of the phrase killer app, > > >>> meaning a software application which makes a new computing platform > > >>> desirable or necessary. Later, it became part of webapp, meaning an > > >>> application made available as a website, but as a word used on its > > >>> own it remained relatively uncommon. > > >> > > >> Good to see you found where "application" has been in use for quite some > > >> time in this context. Heck, if you go to 1984 with the Macintosh it was > > >> the primary term used. Since then it has been often shortened to just > > >> "app", much as "Macintosh" itself has been shortened to "Mac". > > > > > > Huh? The discussion was not about the term 'application', but about > > > the term 'app'. IME, the term 'application' has been in use at least as > > > > "App" as an abbreviation for "application" goes back to at least 1981. > > > > <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/app> > > ----- > > First Known Use of APP > > 1981 > > ----- > > It would have been nice if this part gave a actual reference. Not that > I doubt it, but without a reference, it's just a date. > > > The word itself, with any meaning, has been around a LOT longer, tjough > > in recent years spiking in 1991 and 2003: > > <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/app> > > > > (See the "Trends of 'app'" section. " > > But *because* the word "has been around a LOT longer", we have no > indication whether or not that spike is (only) for the computer-related > meaning of the word or (also) for the *non* computer-related meanings > (appendix, applied, appointed, apprentice, approved, etc. (appetizer > (Merriam-Webster)). > > Anyway, considering what this (non-)discussion is about, it's funny to > see that both your references *do* confirm *our* (Jimmy Wilkinson Knife's > and my) POV! :-) : > > [Emphasis mine:] > > <MW> > *especially* : an application designed for a mobile device (such as a > smartphone) > </MW> > > <CD> > An app is a computer program that is designed for use on a mobile > digital device. > ... > App in British > ... > *esp* downloaded to a mobile device > </CD> > > (AFAIC,) EOD.
Back to alt.test | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Consumers' privacy concerns not backed by their actions Anonymous <nobody@haph.org> - 2018-06-03 16:42 -0400
csiph-web