Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.ipad > #48766

Re: Hey, Nospam

From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.ipad, comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Hey, Nospam
Date 2015-06-05 15:49 +1000
Message-ID <ctcrjiFjtfjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <040620151809088931%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ctcctvFgo2mU1@mid.individual.net> <557105da$0$42794$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com> <ctcna6Fiv3rU1@mid.individual.net> <55712e78$0$29377$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>> Hardly any carriers are actually stupid enough to sell you
>> the phone for the same price they paid for it unless its an
>> obsolete phone and they are getting rid of surplus stock.

> ding ! ding ! ding ! give the guy a prize !
> That is exactly what they do with prepaid service.

Nope. Ours are happy to sell you any of
the current phones with prepaid service.

>> Plenty will sell you a locked phone for a lower
>> price than they will sell you an unlocked phone.

> The point is that without a contract, they will
> not seel you a phone under their own cost.

That's wrong too with locked phones.

> And locked phones actually cost more to the carrier

No they don’t.

> since they have to lock the phones

Plenty of the phone companys are happy to sell carriers
locked phones for the same price as unlocked phones
because locked phones are a big part of the volume
they sell, particularly with some phone models.

> and load/manage/maintain their own bloatware on the phone.

Not all locked phones have any bloatware.

> (which is one very good thing Apple did by preventing
> carriers from customizing the phone's app TOO MUCH.

Irrelevant for the carriers that just want to lock the
phone so that those who buy them at the subsidised
price can only use them on the carrier's network.

> (AT&T got away with disabling many
> things via the carrier.plist and SIM cards).

Irrelevant for the carriers that just want to lock the
phone so that those who buy them at the subsidised
price can only use them on the carrier's network.
 

Back to comp.mobile.ipad | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 08:32 -0700
  Re: Hey, Nospam android <here@there.was> - 2015-06-03 17:44 +0200
  Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-04 06:47 +1000
    Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-03 17:01 -0500
      Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-04 14:13 +1000
        Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-04 06:44 -0500
          Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:13 +1000
            Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-04 17:55 -0500
              Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 11:45 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-04 21:37 -0500
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:36 +1000
      Re: Hey, Nospam Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-06-04 08:55 -0400
      Re: Hey, Nospam gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-06-04 10:00 -0700
        Re: Hey, Nospam Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-06-05 07:51 +0000
      Re: Hey, Nospam George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-06 08:37 -0500
  Re: Hey, Nospam Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-03 17:57 -0400
    Re: Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 16:12 -0700
      Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-03 23:11 -0400
        Re: Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 20:42 -0700
          Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-04 14:17 +1000
            Re: Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 21:34 -0700
              Re: Hey, Nospam jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2015-06-04 16:41 +1200
              Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:09 +1000
            Re: Hey, Nospam me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2015-06-04 13:12 +0000
          Re: Hey, Nospam News <News@Group.Post> - 2015-06-04 07:20 -0400
            Re: Hey, Nospam Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-06-04 09:00 -0400
      Re: Hey, Nospam "Lee Waun" <leewaun@telus.net> - 2015-06-05 20:04 -0700
    Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-03 23:11 -0400
      Re: Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 20:41 -0700
        Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-03 23:53 -0400
          Re: Hey, Nospam Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-06-03 21:30 -0700
            Re: Hey, Nospam me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2015-06-04 13:14 +0000
              Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 12:52 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-04 18:45 +0100
                Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 13:58 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-04 21:20 +0100
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:24 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 18:09 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 11:37 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 22:02 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:19 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:18 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 18:09 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 11:39 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-04 22:02 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-04 21:39 -0500
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:37 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2015-06-05 08:07 -0500
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 13:04 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:21 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-04 22:13 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 14:36 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-05 01:07 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 15:49 +1000
                Re: Hey, Nospam JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-05 16:46 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 15:17 +1000
              Re: Hey, Nospam JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-04 13:44 -0400
                Re: Hey, Nospam "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-06-05 07:22 +1000
      Re: Hey, Nospam George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-06 08:38 -0500
    Re: Hey, Nospam George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-06 08:36 -0500
  Re: Hey, Nospam George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-06 08:35 -0500

csiph-web