Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #679566

Re: 99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Sergio, in <news:nnp87s$nbg$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> <snip warmist alarmist bullshit>

Don't believe the hype... the below is from a prior post I'd made:
Message-ID: <e9391f0d9dc4a4b79fa3520f972fe2f2@dizum.com>
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Let's look at absolute proof that the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks have
fiddled with the temperature records as means of pushing their
libtarded politicized AGW scam via hysterical alarmist
proclamations... take a look at the data in the URL  below...

<http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0beta/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0beta5.txt>

That's the complete UAH lower troposphere temperature dataset.

The sums of all values for the columns is:
Globe: 7.46 C
Globe Land: 10.88 C
Globe Ocean: 6.11 C
Northern Hemisphere: 9.95 C
Northern Hemisphere Land: 11.68 C
Northern Hemisphere Ocean: 8.87 C
Southern Hemisphere: 4.77 C
Southern Hemisphere Land: 8.85 C
Southern Hemisphere Ocean: 3.88 C

Does anyone believe the planet has heated up by an average 7.46 C
(13.43 F) from December 1978 to 2016 to date?

Does anyone believe the Northern Hemisphere Land has heated up by an
average 11.68 C (21.02 F) from December 1978 to 2016 to date?

Or is the more likely scenario that the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks have
been bumping up the numbers for the past four years or so, so they can
bleat out yet another alarmist "warmust monf eva! DUUURRRH!" lie?

The averages from December 1978 through December 2011:
Globe: -0.0074811083
Globe Land: -0.0063224181
Globe Ocean: -0.0080352645
Northern Hemisphere: -0.0088161209
Northern Hemisphere Land: -0.0083375315
Northern Hemisphere Ocean: -0.0091435768
Southern Hemisphere: -0.0067506297
Southern Hemisphere Land: -0.0022921914
Southern Hemisphere Ocean: -0.0077329975

Does... does that show a *negative* average for all categories from
December 1978 through December 2011? LOL

But that'd mean the planet was actually 397 months * -0.0074811083 C /
month = -2.9699999951 C (5.346 F) *cooler* on average than the 1978
average by December 2011. That's not reflected on the very graphs the
Klimate Katastrophe Kooks use.

The average from January 2012 through 2016 to date:
Globe: 0.2005769231
Globe Land: 0.2575
Globe Ocean: 0.1788461538
Northern Hemisphere: 0.2586538462
Northern Hemisphere Land: 0.2882692308
Northern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.2403846154
Southern Hemisphere: 0.1432692308
Southern Hemisphere Land: 0.1876923077
Southern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.1336538462

Well, that makes it pretty easy to see when they started fudging the
numbers so they could keep bleating alarmist bullshit about each month
being a new record, eh? LOL

The average from January 2014 through 2016 to date:
Globe: 0.2896428571
Globe Land: 0.305
Globe Ocean: 0.2842857143
Northern Hemisphere: 0.3742857143
Northern Hemisphere Land: 0.3664285714
Northern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.3803571429
Southern Hemisphere: 0.2053571429
Southern Hemisphere Land: 0.1667857143
Southern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.2132142857

The average from January 2015 through 2016 to date:
Globe: 0.371875
Globe Land: 0.413125
Globe Ocean: 0.356875
Northern Hemisphere: 0.4975
Northern Hemisphere Land: 0.52625
Northern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.48
Southern Hemisphere: 0.248125
Southern Hemisphere Land: 0.1575
Southern Hemisphere Ocean: 0.26625

Does anyone believe that the planet has been heating up by 0.371875 C
(0.6694 F) *per* *month* on average since January 2015? That'd mean
the planet's heated up by 10.7104 F on average since January 2015.
Anyone gullible enough to believe that? Anyone? Anyone?

Does anyone believe that Northern Hemisphere Land is heating up by
0.52625 C (0.9473 F) *per* *month* on average since January 2015?
That'd mean the Northern Hemisphere Land has heated up by 15.1568 F on
average since January 2015. Anyone stupid and gullible enough to
believe that? Anyone? Anyone?

Just how gullible do these morons think people are? LOL

SPNAK! on the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks.

As the anthropogenic global warming scam is exposed, the kooktards
pushing the scam get more hysterical and alarmist... and now we see
that it's reaching the point where they're making a ludicrous
laughingstock of themselves.

Now bleat, morons. Your religiously held belief in AGW has yet again
been exposed to the light of truth, and it's dying, shriveling up
before your eyes.

<snicker>
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

I've got the underlying (read: unmanipulated) data from RSS, UAH,
NASA, NOAA and NSIDC... every data set shows the planet is cooling,
has been for ~18 years, and will continue to do so for a very long
time, given that solar and orbital forcing are the main drivers, and
those are both in slowly-intensifying cooling stages.

I've got peer-reviewed studies proving that CO2 causes global cooling
and can explain in detail the mechanism by which it does so... one of
those studies is from NASA.

I've also got quotes from climate researchers proving they know it's
cooling... one of them (Asher Minns, from the scandal-rocked
University of East Anglia) notably mentioned that telling people to
prepare for global warming *and* an ice age could cause problems for
the climate community's credibility... you'll note he didn't state
'global cooling', he specifically said "an ice age".

Don't be a chump, you're being lied to.

-- 

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature =
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even
basic geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has k'lamed that magnetism
has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then
backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature
due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't
know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and
denies the existence of magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has described a
universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe
in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could
not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality. Kensi the moron is Paul
G. Derbyshire.

Paul G. Derbyshire
9 Bennett St
Pembroke, Ontario, Canada K8A 3Y6
(613) 732-3590
twisted0n3@gmail.com

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 07:17 +0200
  Re: 99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 08:39 +0200
    Re: 99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-03 07:28 +0200
      Re: 99 Percent Chance 2016 Will Be the Hottest Year on Record "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-03 08:14 +0200

csiph-web