Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #454861
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written |
|---|---|
| From | David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> |
| Subject | Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, |
| References | (1 earlier) <2e5bda71-c0c9-4d54-9e92-f100079f8ee8@googlegroups.com> <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com> <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com> <nud1op$f8a$1@panix3.panix.com> <6700e182-6201-4da3-bbb5-480283d17f53@googlegroups.com> |
| Organization | Extremely dis |
| Message-ID | <cM-dnX1dpOGnZJfFnZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-10-22 00:29 -0500 |
On 2016-10-21, Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 8:30:20 AM UTC-4, William December Starr wrote: >> It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite >> and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe, >> wouldn't it? > > Though still finite, I wonder what we could do with Dark Matter and > Dark Energy to give us more working material... Remember that technically, the 13.6 billion lightyear radius of the universe is only how far we can SEE, due to the speed of light. We have no real clue how far beyond that, if any, the actual universe extends. So don't think we're strictly and forever limited to what's in the visible-right-now portion. Dave, tl:dr - big bang may be BIG -- \/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> website on VIC is down, probably for good - oh well/ I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 15:06 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-17 15:16 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us> - 2016-10-17 18:33 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-17 19:23 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:18 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-18 09:06 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 09:46 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-18 14:28 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:19 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 16:26 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 21:58 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:20 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us> - 2016-10-18 10:29 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 06:11 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-22 00:29 -0500
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-10-22 09:26 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-10-24 21:17 +0000
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-25 04:15 -0500
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Adamastor Glace Mortimer <nospam@no.invalid> - 2016-11-08 01:19 +0000
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-08 04:25 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200
csiph-web