Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #697172

Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Show all headers | View raw

mmmmmmmmmmmmm




Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 22:51:29 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning
 Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:51:29 +0000

Below is a report from government NASA on radio emissions from Jupiter. The Faraday Law of atoms causes stars to shine and causes planets to emit radio waves. 

--- quoting NASA --- 

Jupiter does emit radio waves of a different sort at frequencies above 100 MHz. These are the decimetric radio waves and are believed to be emitted by extremely energetic electrons moving at close to the speed of light close to the planet near its equator. (Decimetric means tenth of a meter since the wavelength of this type of radio emission is several tenths of a meter). Jupiter's rotation period was confirmed and other properties of the magnetic field including its axial tilt were determined using decimetric radio observations. 

Recently the Hubble Space telescope has been used to observe Jupiter's aurora in the ultraviolet and has found evidence of the powerful currents that are flowing between Jupiter and Io. 

These spacecraft are confirming some explanations of Jupiter radio emission but are also discovering new radio phenomena that raise many more questions. 


Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:45:52 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning
 Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 07:45:52 +0000


So, let us do a little bit of philosophy here before turning to bed. We have a universe made of one big atom 231Pu containing mass and space. The mass is other atoms. We have stars that turn Space into more mass via Faraday law of an atom's muons thrusting through an atom's protons and creating monoples-- turning Space into new matter. 

Is that appealing? A 231Pu Atom Totality becoming a new generation Atom Totality. 

Let us weigh that with Life in biology. Is it acceptable that a generation of life can be happy that their kind, their species lived, prospered and multiplied, and built a new generation to carry into the future? 

I can accept that purpose for biology life. But for all of the universe, i somehow am expecting more than just growth. More than just growing from 231Pu into say element 96 then the next one etc etc. 

I think every human can be happy to know their life is carried on by a future generation as the meaning of life. But it seems that the cosmos as a whole needs something more in its future, more than just growth. 

So, here we go from science to philosophy to religion. For we need something more than just growth to bigger and bigger, to cycle to cycle. We need something of love, to make the whole thing valuable and worthy of the journey. And i cannot think of a better analogy than humanity and plants and animals. The Atom Totality is like God compared to humans and humans are like God compared to the animals and plants. If in the growth of humans into the future it is recognized that our growth cannot proceed unless we carry all the plants and animals with us, not extincting them to make more room for more humans. 

In like manner of the Atom Totality, instead of a future of ever bigger Atom Totality with lifeforms perishing in numerous cycles, what if the formula of God was that the Atom Totality becomes humanity, a humanity that carried all the plants and animals like a Noah's Ark onto the doorstep of God, where in an instant of time physics and biology entwined as one God. And then, let the cycle of matter and life begin all over again. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:01:07 -0800 (PST)

Subject: experiment for NASA Re: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are
 Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of
 starpower 1/1000
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:01:07 +0000


experiment for NASA Re: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000

On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 12:51:33 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Below is a report from government NASA on radio emmisions from Jupiter. The Faraday Law of atoms causes stars to shine and causes planets to emit radio waves. 
> 

I do not know if NASA does experimental science? If they do, I entice them into this one. 


> --- quoting NASA --- 
> 
> Jupiter does emit radio waves of a different sort at frequencies above 100 MHz. These are the decimetric radio waves and are believed to be emitted by extremely energetic electrons moving at close to the speed of light close to the planet near its equator. (Decimetric means tenth of a meter since the wavelength of this type of radio emission is several tenths of a meter). Jupiter's rotation period was confirmed and other properties of the magnetic field including its axial tilt were determined using decimetric radio observations. 
> 
> Recently the Hubble Space telescope has been used to observe Jupiter's aurora in the ultraviolet and has found evidence of the powerful currents that are flowing between Jupiter and Io. 
> 
> These spacecraft are confirming some explanations of Jupiter radio emission but are also discovering new radio phenomena that raise many more questions. 

EXPERIMENT:: Now, I am going on just pure intuition and a tiny bit of experience in radio physics. So here goes. 


Find a tower of metal, whether used or not used. It is a antennae of sorts. Find out if that antennae by its sheer composition emits a radio signal. I would guess yes because it is composed of metal atoms and those atoms are doing the Faraday Law. Now the planet Jupiter is a large body of atoms doing the Faraday Law and would be expected to emit much radio waves. Our metal antennae is a small body, but still doing the Faraday Law. 

Now here, in this experiment I am backing into, the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR and what that is, is not the stupid silly Big Bang, but is the fact that all atoms of the entire cosmos is doing a Faraday Law and all those atoms, everyone of them is "leaking out radio waves" of however tiny and small which goes to make up the CMBR. 

But here, all I want is a Experiment that proves any given object has atoms which is doing Faraday law and which has a tiny "radio wave noise". 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:37:29 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Call it Dirac Radioactivity or call it RSMMM Re: Revolutionary idea--
 Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is
 just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:37:30 +0000


Call it Dirac Radioactivity or call it RSMMM Re: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000

Somewhat amazing that year 2014 was an amazing year in Chemistry Research, two experiments or observations took place in 2014 that is revolutionary science experiments. The one took place in Denmark with Dr. Kjaergaard discovering that two positive charges attract one another of hydrogen and phosphorus. To make a long story short, Kjaergaard is confirming that the Real Electron = 105 MeV and Real Proton = 840MeV and that little .5MeV particle is a magnetic monopole. That is the upshot of Kjaergaard's hugely important experiment in Denmark in 2014. 

In another part of the world in 2014, Dr. Brandenburg was finding out that xenon was too much concentrated in Mars, the planet, and otherwise levels of U235 in ore deposits were too high. 

Now, Dirac had two major science issues going for him most of his life-- magnetic monopoles and what he called a New Radioactivity-- how the world grows. You see, for Dirac, the Big Bang is science fiction, for Dirac sensed that the Universe grows from some form of radioactivity. 

Dirac, in all his life, never found the monopole, but, it was under his nose all the time. For in 1897, JJ Thomson discovered a particle of .5MeV and the sad part about Thomson's discovery, is that he had not found the electron, which he thought this .5MeV particle was, but rather, he had found Dirac's monopole. Only by 1936 with Anderson and Neddermeyer was the REAL ELECTRON discovered, only no one realized it until 2017, by me, who saw that 9muons = 1 proton plus or minus .7% 945/938. 

So, Dirac's monopole was there all along, and only by 2014 with Kjaergaard in Denmark do we start to see a massive experiment undertaking to see the theory that Real Electron = 105MeV and that Maxwell theory of EM has no force of repel, for EM has only attract force and we were fooled by Pauli Exclusion as a denial of same space occupancy. Columbus was fooled when he thought he landed in China or India. And physicists were fooled in thinking there is EM repel, when it is just denial of same space. And physicists were fooled in thinking that tiny .5MeV was the electron. 

Then on to Dirac's New Radioactivity, how the universe grows. The Universe never had a Big Bang-- that is childish poppycock idea. The Universe grows bigger and more massive by a form of Radioactivity. And the mechanism is Faraday's Law. The proton is 8 muons and forms a proton closed loop wire. The muon acts like a bar magnet and as it thrusts through the proton wire creates a monopole. This is turning Space into energy/matter. So if the universe starts out as 1 Hydrogen atom, that Faraday Law on one proton one muon keeps creating monopoles which are saved and collected inside that atom of hydrogen until it has eaten up enough Space that the monopoles saved add up to a neutron. Now we have 2protons2muons doing the Faraday Law, eating up space and eventually creating a tritium atom, etc etc. 

So, when Dr. Brandenburg sees xenon in abundance on Mars, it is not from a nuclear fusion bomb explosion, nor is the African U235 a past long ago bomb explosion remnant, no. What these isotope anomalies really are, is the working of Dirac's New Radioactivities. I like to call it Radioactive Spontaneous Magnetic Monopole Materialization, RSMMM. 

The "spontaneous" part of the process is that Faraday's Law is not the movement of electrons in a proton that consists of 8 muons, no, the 8 muons are needed to form a octagon of geometry to be a wire. So the spontaneous part of RSMMM is the fact that Faraday's Law requires a current, and the only particle to be a current inside a proton is a magnetic monopole. Now I am not saying all Magnetic Monopoles = .5MeV, for even radio waves are monopoles and are of eV not MeV. 

But, the greatest story of this Faraday Law, is that our Sun and stars shine, not because of Fusion, but because every atom in our Sun is doing a Faraday Law thrusting of muon through proton and even of proton through orbital muons, both ways-- proton through muons and muon through proton. And the enormous photons produced by Faraday's Law is what makes stars shine. There is a tiny contribution by fusion, but if stars had to depend on fusion alone, our universe would be mostly dark black, with only tiny tiny glow from fusion activity. 


Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:23:01 -0800 (PST) 

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire 
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV 
 and .5MeV = monopole 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:23:01 +0000 

Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole 

Now here is more information on that Mars hypothetical nuclear explosion:: of course i am going to comment line by line explaining that in nuclear fusion there is little to no fusion going on but rather a Faraday Law 
--- quoting --- 
By Tara MacIsaac, Epoch Times 
Mars has a high concentration of the gas isotope Xenon 129 in its atmosphere. Xenon 129 is produced by nuclear reactions. The surface of the red planet also has an excess of uranium and thorium. 

These conditions are likely the result of two large anomalous nuclear explosions on Mars in the past, argues propulsion scientist Dr. John Brandenburg in a 2014 paper, titled “Evidence of a Massive Thermonuclear Explosion on Mars in the Past.” 

On Earth, in Oklo, Gabon, uranium was extracted in 1972 and found to have unusual properties. Natural uranium deposits all contain about 0.7 percent U235. The isotope U235 in the Oklo mine, however, showed at levels around 0.6 percent, suggesting the U235 had already been “burned.” 

On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 7:38:10 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math:
Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law


Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:37:06 -0800 (PST)

Subject: does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and
 Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space
 into energy/matter via Faraday Law
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:37:06 +0000


does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Now, I believe the muon can be a closed loop wire once there is 8 muons in the orbital of an atom. That would mean element oxygen, where carbon is 2 muons short, and neon is 2 muons advanced. Now can the 10 muons in neon offer neon more stability in a Faraday demonstration? 

Anyway, the Oxygen atom has 8 orbital muons which means its nucleus of 8protons and 8neutrons can be a bar thrusting magnet through that of the 8 orbital muons. 

So in a Faraday Law Demonstration every single proton is a 8 muons configured into a closed loop proton wire. 1proton = 840MeV = 8muons, where 1muon = 105MeV. 

So, in hydrogen there is only one way for a Faraday demonstration-- the orbital muon thrusting through the 8 muons of the single proton. 

But in Oxygen there are 8 orbital muons that can form a closed loop wire, call it a orbital-muon-wire and the protons and neutrons can thrust through the 8 orbital muons producing even more magnetic monopoles than just the monopoles formed from the muons acting as bar magnet thrusting through the protons. 

So, what I wonder is, if oxygen being the first such element that can produce monopoles from not just proton wires but from orbital muons as wires, wondering if that ability by oxygen is why oxygen is so very special over the other first 8 elements? I know through out Old Chemistry, there is much to do about "oxidation" and oxidation states. But is oxygen recognized for its supreme ability to Faraday Law Demonstrations, which the other first 8 elements simply cannot perform? Does it give oxygen a significant edge above and beyond hydrogen helium lithium Beryllium, Boron Carbon Nitrogen?? 

What say you-- Old Chemistry-- did oxygen have a cut above these others? 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:43:17 -0800 (PST)

Subject: does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and
 Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space
 into energy/matter via Faraday Law
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 06:43:17 +0000


does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Alright one property of oxygen that needs explanation by Faraday law theory is its combustible nature. Here i would need to explain its neighbor fluorine also, but then, have to explain why reactivity seems to all shut down with neon. 

So is the fact that the orbital muons now are Faraday demonstrable at 8 and 9 cause huge reactivity but at 10 appear to shut down. 

I may have to sleep on this one. 

But one superlative of oxygen is that it is the 3rd most abundant element in Cosmos after hydrogen and helium. So the fact that 16O has a orbital muon wire is likely the cause of such abundance in Dirac's New Radioactivity 

So how can orbital muon wire explain how neon shuts down reactivity? Here i may need to define reactivity via Maxwell theory-- something about the deformation of 8 or 9 orbital muons to become a 10 orbital muon of neon. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:58:04 -0800 (PST)

Subject: does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and
 Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space
 into energy/matter via Faraday Law
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 06:58:04 +0000


does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Now here i am going to question the famous Rutherford experiment the one in which he shot particles at a gold or metal leaf and where some of those particles recoiled back, telling Rutherford that nearly all the mass is concentrated in the nucleus. 

I suspect that experiment needs repeating for the first 26 elements especially oxygen fluorine neon for i suspect the center of those atoms are almost empty of protons and where the protons are more likely found in the muon orbital cloud to enhance the making of orbital cloud wire for Faraday law. 

I think it is hard to repeat Rutherford on non metals but not impossible. 

AP


Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:37:48 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday law atomic theory Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion,
 but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 07:37:48 +0000


Faraday law atomic theory Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Now a key feature of Faraday Law atomic theory is that the protons and muons are aligned for maximum production of monopoles. Where 1proton =8muons and 1neutron =1proton +1 
muon. 

Now this is a job for Dirac or Tesla, not me if given, 20 protons 20 muons configure those as wires and bar magnet to yield maximum current inside a neon atom. Do the same of 19protons 19muons for fluorine and finally 16 protons 16 muons for oxygen. 

I suspect many of the protons will be in orbitals along with orbital muons and a somewhat vacant center of the atom in order to achieve maximum Faraday production of monopoles. 

Now the helium atom would have 4 protons 4muons and those 4protons would be 4x8= 32 muons. So, how to arrange 36 muons for maximum Faraday law. And, helium is the most stable of all inert gases all elements for that sake. 

Now 36 is a perfect square, so let me check on neon, we have 20x8= 160 plus 20 is 180. 

AP 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:58 -0700
  Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:39 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:19 -0700
      Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 20:07 -0700
        Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 15:12 -0700
          Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-29 03:16 +0000
          Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-29 03:19 +0000
          Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 12:26 -0700
            Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 12:37 -0700
              Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:27 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 17:31 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 15:39 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:44 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:30 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 21:18 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:47 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:15 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 12:19 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:20 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:21 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 12:18 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 18:40 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 18:03 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 14:05 -0700
              page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:49 -0700
                Re: page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 09:22 -0700
                Re: page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:11 -0700

csiph-web