Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #696916

Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Show all headers | View raw

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL



Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:35:00 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Bethe's starpower depends on a 1 in 1 billion chance Re: our entire
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
 and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 07:35:00 +0000


Bethe's starpower depends on a 1 in 1 billion chance Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

Quoting Wikipedia below, on how the Sun mostly shines out energy. However, the huge problem is that daft scientists who believe in this nonsense-- must explain how it is that a proton undergoes this fusion with a probability of taking place in 1 in 1 billion years. You see, our Sun shines profusely, yet physicists of Old Physics think this dependable profuse shining has a mechanism of 1 in 1 billion. This is the silly Bethe Solar fusion. The AP Starpower is based on the Faraday Law, that each and every atom inside the Sun, everyone of them has protons composed of 8muons, where 1 proton = 8muons, and where the electron = 1 muon and the .5MeV particle is not the electron, but a magnetic monopole. Every proton inside the Sun is doing a Faraday Law mechanism where it is a 8 muon closed loop wire and the electronMuon is a bar magnet that moves inside the proton and creates a electricity of a monopole that flows in the proton. The proton can emit this monopole outside its atom and eventually escape the Sun and find its way to hitting Earth. What the Faraday law in the Sun is doing is eating up Space, and converting it into magnetic monopoles. 

Now, any reader can read and believe in the farfetched silly and stupid Bethe Solar fusion with its 1 in 1 billion chance of being successful. Or, they can read AP's way of stars shining, that each and every proton inside a star is doing the Faraday law and creating monopoles out of the Space the star occupies. 

We see stars shining each and every minute, each and every day. Do you honestly believe the dependability, the reliability of stars shining depends on a probability of 1 in a billion, or, do you believe in AP's view-- every proton inside a star is making sunlight, making photons. 

--- quoting Wikipedia --- 
followed by the beta-plus decay of the diproton to deuterium: 

2 
2He 
         →         2 
1H 
         +          
e+ 
         +          
ν 
e 
with the overall formula: 

1 
1H 
         +         1 
1H 
         →         2 
1H 
         +          
e+ 
         +          
ν 
e         +         0.42 MeV 
This first step is extremely slow because the positron emission of the diproton to deuterium is extremely rare (the vast majority of the time, the diproton decays back into two hydrogen-1 unbound protons through proton emission). This is because the emission of the positron is brought about by the weak nuclear force, which is immensely weaker than the strong nuclear force and the electromagnetic force. 

The half-life of a proton in the core of the Sun before it is involved in a successful proton–proton fusion is estimated to be about one billion years, even at the extreme pressures and temperatures found there. 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:55:49 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: Bethe's starpower depends on a 1 in 1 billion chance Re: our
 entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron=
 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 07:55:50 +0000


Re: Bethe's starpower depends on a 1 in 1 billion chance Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 1:35:03 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Quoting Wikipedia below, on how the Sun mostly shines out energy. However, the huge problem is that daft scientists who believe in this nonsense-- must explain how it is that a proton undergoes this fusion with a probability of taking place in 1 in 1 billion years. You see, our Sun shines profusely, yet physicists of Old Physics think this dependable profuse shining has a mechanism of 1 in 1 billion. This is the silly Bethe Solar fusion. The AP Starpower is based on the Faraday Law, that each and every atom inside the Sun, everyone of them has protons composed of 8muons, where 1 proton = 8muons, and where the electron = 1 muon and the .5MeV particle is not the electron, but a magnetic monopole. Every proton inside the Sun is doing a Faraday Law mechanism where it is a 8 muon closed loop wire and the electronMuon is a bar magnet that moves inside the proton and creates a electricity of a monopole that flows in the proton. The proton can emit this monopole outside its atom and eventually escape the Sun and find its way to hitting Earth. What the Faraday law in the Sun is doing is eating up Space, and converting it into magnetic monopoles. 
> 

Now my critics would immediately jump up and down and say-- well, if that is true, why is planet Earth not shining for its atoms have protons and electrons doing the Faraday Law. Why is Earth not shining? 

And that is a good question. And perhaps I have no fast immediate answer other than to say, you need the momentum in a hot kinetic energy environment such as the Sun and stars. Realize, that when you do the Faraday Law with a slow moving magnet, you get little current. 

Now, my theory of Faraday Law causing stars to shine, not the feeble fusion in stars. If correct, then there is the good chance that large planets, like Jupiter have some "glow" or enormous radio noise of photons in the radio wave frequency. So we have on Jupiter, much radio noise but little to account for what makes Jupiter's radio wave noise. So the Faraday mechanism easily would say that some of the protons on Jupiter have a rapid motion electron=muon act as a bar magnet creating a monopole but a monopole not large like the sun, but rather radio photons. 

Also, the Faraday Law Mechanism of stars shining would easily explain why the hottest part of the Sun is not its center but its outer surface. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 00:08:17 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
 and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 08:08:18 +0000


Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

And, alas, something I never thought I would involve with, atomic bombs. It is thought that in a fusion bomb, that atoms are fusing to create the enormous energy. But, there is always required a fission bomb explode before it sets off the fusion part of the bomb. 

But, what I contend is that, although some fusion is occurring but what is really happening is that the fission part of the bomb raises the kinetic energy of the protons and their electrons=muons to perform Faraday Law and that the explosion is a maximization not of fusing protons, but rather of creating much Faraday Law electricity as monopoles. 

Now a quick test of this Faraday mechanism would be to analyze the gamma radiation in a fusion bomb explosion. Does the gamma radiation fit with fusion of protons or does it fit with Faraday Law as electricity in gamma monopoles. I would guess that if Faraday Law is at work here, not fusion that you would have immensely more gamma radiation than what fusion would say. 

AP

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:17:25 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
 and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 09:17:26 +0000

Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

Looking for anomalies in hydrogen bombs-- 


Volume 60, Issue 1 
March 1955 
Pages 45–52 
Effects of radioactive debris from nuclear explosions on the electrical conductivity of the lower atmosphere 
Authors 
D. Lee Harris 
First published: 
March 1955Full publication history 
DOI: 
10.1029/JZ060i001p00045  View/save citation 
Cited by (CrossRef): 
14 articles Check for updates Citation tools 
Abstract 

An increase in the ionization near the ground due to the fall-out from a radioactive cloud formed by a nuclear explosion will increase the conductivity and lower the potential gradient in the lower atmosphere. Records of atmospheric conductivity and potential gradient from the Tucson Magnetic Observatory are compared with records of the deposition of atomic debris on the ground following the Nevada tests. The observed changes are not inconsistent with values computed from theoretical considerations. Most of the effects are confined to a very shallow layer, within a few meters of the ground. 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:29:09 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
 and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 09:29:10 +0000


Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

Now here is a remarkable website arguing that Mars had a Hydrogen bomb explosion. I would argue that his isotope studies are evidence of the Faraday Law inside of atoms and not that of fusion. 

Evidence for a Large Anomalous Nuclear Explosions in Mars Past 
PDFspsr.utsi.edu › articles › EvidenceforaLar... 
by JE Brandenburg 
Hydrogen bombs are boosted by fission of a uranium or thorium casing ~50% of ... Delayed neutrons. Acidalia debris. Gamma rays. Before event. Immediately after event. Present old surface old surface old surface. 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:23:01 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
 understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
 and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:23:01 +0000

Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

Now here is more information on that Mars hypothetical nuclear explosion:: of course i am going to comment line by line explaining that in nuclear fusion there is little to no fusion going on but rather a Faraday Law 
--- quoting --- 
By Tara MacIsaac, Epoch Times 
Mars has a high concentration of the gas isotope Xenon 129 in its atmosphere. Xenon 129 is produced by nuclear reactions. The surface of the red planet also has an excess of uranium and thorium. 

These conditions are likely the result of two large anomalous nuclear explosions on Mars in the past, argues propulsion scientist Dr. John Brandenburg in a 2014 paper, titled “Evidence of a Massive Thermonuclear Explosion on Mars in the Past.” 

On Earth, in Oklo, Gabon, uranium was extracted in 1972 and found to have unusual properties. Natural uranium deposits all contain about 0.7 percent U235. The isotope U235 in the Oklo mine, however, showed at levels around 0.6 percent, suggesting the U235 had already been “burned.” 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:23:51 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning
 Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 04:23:51 +0000


Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000

Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000 

Please do not hold me to the 1/1000, it maybe something like 10^-6 rather than 10^-3. 

There is no doubt in the world that fusion exists, and that fission, even more so, exists. 

But, what I have discovered is that the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV and that tiny particle .5MeV is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. What that means for energy of the world, is that every atom is a Faraday Law Demonstration of every hydrogen atom system inside an atom. Every proton with its muon, every neutron, are constantly doing a Faraday law and producing electricity inside the atom, producing magnetic monopoles. And these monopoles can either stay inside the atom or flow out as radiation. This is where stars and our Sun get their power, their energy. There is a tad bit of fusion, but not very much, certainly not as much to let the Sun shine as it does every day of our life. 

Now how is the Faraday Law conducted inside atoms? A proton is 8 muons and when formed into a octagon ring, the proton is a closed loop wire, leaving the electronmuon as a bar magnet thrust through the proton ring creates a current-- a magnetic monopole that either stays inside the atom or moves out and becomes sunlight. 

Now, all atoms are Faraday law machines, so why does not Earth or Moon or Jupiter shine like a Star? Well, a astro body has to get large enough to get hot enough so that the kinetic energy of its atoms reach a temperature in which the electronmuon moves fast enough through its protons to produce radiation of star shine. But this monopole creation occurs in all atoms and although not star light, some of these monopoles are radio waves, and Jupiter has a large radio emission. 

AP 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:58 -0700
  Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:39 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:19 -0700
      Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 20:07 -0700
        Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 15:12 -0700
          Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-29 03:16 +0000
          Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-29 03:19 +0000
          Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 12:26 -0700
            Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 12:37 -0700
              Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 09:27 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 17:31 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 15:39 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:44 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:30 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 21:18 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:47 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:15 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 12:19 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:20 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:21 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 12:18 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 18:40 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 18:03 -0700
                Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 14:05 -0700
              page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:49 -0700
                Re: page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 09:22 -0700
                Re: page1 True Chemistry Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:11 -0700

csiph-web