Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29396
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: concatenation operator glyph |
| Date | 2014-07-28 18:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <c3nb1hFu0tbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <tkdat9h5v0qusrdqpbevhmj7gomcrrsnjl@4ax.com> <53d631a4$0$2935$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <7joct9dkjjuqlr9dmtodv29ttqqmk81pl3@4ax.com> |
On 28.07.2014 16:47, Roedy Green wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:19:00 +0200, Silvio <silvio@internet.com> > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > > >> Please stop pushing the concatenation topic. It is a non issue and you >> are taking it way too far. > > What percentage of your programs contain an concatenation operator? What does this have to do with the topic? And why do you bring up the topic of a concatenation operator code point for Unicode in a Java forum, where you explicitly state that "This is a different problem from how to represent concatenation in Java."? Something seems to be eluding me. > Nearly all of mine do. There's also StringBuilder which is usually more efficient when Strings are created with loops. Kind regards robert
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
concatenation operator glyph Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-07-27 10:31 -0700
Re: concatenation operator glyph Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-07-27 10:47 -0700
Re: concatenation operator glyph Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-07-28 13:19 +0200
Re: concatenation operator glyph Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-07-28 07:47 -0700
Re: concatenation operator glyph Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-07-28 18:11 +0200
Re: concatenation operator glyph Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-07-28 19:01 +0200
csiph-web