Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Robert Klemme Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: concatenation operator glyph Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:11:28 +0200 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <53d631a4$0$2935$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <7joct9dkjjuqlr9dmtodv29ttqqmk81pl3@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net wdaEOx2A8UsiCFV7qOkP/gPiuH+wBESRkQwb+j6fQk1npQyU4= Cancel-Lock: sha1:I1yXO3Fi5kVgur6F9WWVo+AgBeI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 In-Reply-To: <7joct9dkjjuqlr9dmtodv29ttqqmk81pl3@4ax.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:29396 On 28.07.2014 16:47, Roedy Green wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:19:00 +0200, Silvio > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > > >> Please stop pushing the concatenation topic. It is a non issue and you >> are taking it way too far. > > What percentage of your programs contain an concatenation operator? What does this have to do with the topic? And why do you bring up the topic of a concatenation operator code point for Unicode in a Java forum, where you explicitly state that "This is a different problem from how to represent concatenation in Java."? Something seems to be eluding me. > Nearly all of mine do. There's also StringBuilder which is usually more efficient when Strings are created with loops. Kind regards robert