Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28426
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer |
| Date | 2014-05-10 23:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <bt7jpaFa8d5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vhljm9llt6jau94jqr573ccpjcnhkunsil@4ax.com> <slrnlmn1n7.bi9.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <mr0qm9hbbeqj0rggqco3umj91bqvjeti58@4ax.com> <en0tm9pu331ts50galimgbk8bkseu83mtk@4ax.com> |
On 10.05.2014 22:18, Roedy Green wrote: > On Fri, 09 May 2014 09:34:09 -0700, Roedy Green > <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted > someone who said : > >> On Thu, 8 May 2014 13:30:15 +0000 (UTC), Andreas Leitgeb >> <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted >> someone who said : >> >>> I'm wondering, if your lego stack is higher than necessary. Are you >>> placing BufferedWriter over BufferedOutputStream? I think you can >>> put the BufferedOutputStream back into the lego bag in that case. ;) >> >> I think some experiments are in order. > > There are the results: > Using a file of random characters of 400 MB and buffers of 32K bytes > > HunkIO 1.20 seconds <-- does an all at once read. > using BufferedReader backed with BufferedInputStream ratio 0.50 > buffsize 32768 bytes 1.65 seconds > plain BufferedReader buffsize 32768 bytes 1.76 seconds I find this a fairly unspecific description of the test you did. We do not know what your test did to ensure file system caching or GC effects did not influence the measurement etc. > The bottom line is either use HunkIO when you have the RAM or give 50% > of your buffer space to the inputstream and 50% to the Reader > in other works 100K of buffer space would have a 50K inputstream > buffer and the reader would have a 25K buffer because it is measured > in chars. I tried ratios from .1 to .9. 50% was best. If I'm not mistaken you did not test cases where there is just a BufferedReader OR a BufferedInputStream - that was what Andreas was hinting at if I'm not mistaken. I don't think duplicate buffering will make things better. I had expected at least three tests (double buffering, byte buffering, char buffering) plus the code. Cheers robert
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-06 23:48 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-08 13:30 +0000
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-09 09:34 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 13:18 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-10 23:24 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 16:08 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-11 16:02 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 11:50 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 12:10 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-11 21:34 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 12:55 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 16:55 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-16 17:36 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 19:52 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 16:37 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 17:21 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-05-11 09:05 +0000
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-12 02:07 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-12 12:20 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 20:19 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-18 05:28 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-18 23:54 +0200
csiph-web