Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28428
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer |
| Date | 2014-05-10 17:21 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <eegtm9d1ijt1u9fttnjk7o7hnphf0a46td@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vhljm9llt6jau94jqr573ccpjcnhkunsil@4ax.com> <slrnlmn1n7.bi9.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <mr0qm9hbbeqj0rggqco3umj91bqvjeti58@4ax.com> <en0tm9pu331ts50galimgbk8bkseu83mtk@4ax.com> <bt7jpaFa8d5U1@mid.individual.net> |
On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:24:57 +0200, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >I don't think duplicate buffering will >make things better. It does. And allocating your space exactly 50:50 makes a noticeable difference. the plain Buffered reader was done like this: final BufferedReader ibr = new BufferedReader( new FileReader( sampleDataFile ), buffsize / 2 ); It got whatever the default buffering on the internal inputstream is. It is not as fast as specifying buffers for the internal inputstream, lego-style. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com Culture is your operating system. ~ Terence McKenna (born: 1946-11-16 died: 2000-04-03 at age: 53)
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-06 23:48 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-08 13:30 +0000
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-09 09:34 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 13:18 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-10 23:24 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 16:08 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-11 16:02 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 11:50 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 12:10 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-11 21:34 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-11 12:55 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 16:55 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-16 17:36 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 19:52 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 16:37 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-10 17:21 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-05-11 09:05 +0000
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-12 02:07 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-12 12:20 +0200
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-16 20:19 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-18 05:28 -0700
Re: byte stream vs char stream buffer Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-18 23:54 +0200
csiph-web