Re: Testers wanted!

From	Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.misc
Subject	Re: Testers wanted!
Date	2014-05-07 14:49 +0000
Organization	TARFU
Message-ID	<bsuvfgFflr6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <op.xfc6a9e16zenlw@localhost> <bsorktF6lsqU1@mid.individual.net> <op.xfdnr6oh6zenlw@localhost> <op.xfdn0hmq6zenlw@localhost> <op.xfdu5ahy6zenlw@localhost>

Show all headers | View raw

Rod Pemberton <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> wrote:
> Were you (we) looking at the correct object files?

Hi Rod, you are raising a few very valid points here. I could not
reply in the past days, because I has some urgent personal business
to attend to.

However, I have a 64-bit box in the mail, so I will soon be able
to conduct some own experiments. I'll keep you all informed about
the results.

Nils

> The build builds four versions: scc0, scc1, scc, scc2.
> The build compares scc and scc2, which are the same.
> Then, the build deletes scc2.  I.e., isn't the equal
> comparison proof that it's building correctly?
> That's 3 stages after the 1st bootstrap version.
> 
> You had me diff scc and scc1.
> scc1 is generated from scc0's objects.
> scc  is generated from scc1's objects.
> scc0's and scc1's objects are different.
> Specifically:
> 
> opt.o scan.o sym.o misc.o prep.o tree.o
> 
> scc1 was compiled by scc0, but scc0 wasn't compiled
> some form/version of scc.  scc0 was compiled by GCC.
> 
> It seems valid to me that binary from GCC compiled
> code (scc0) wouldn't necessarily match that from
> scc0 compiled code (scc1).  I.e., they're from
> different compilers.
> 
> So, why do they match for the older version?  I.e.,
> are you (we) looking at this wrongly? backwards?
> 
> Also, a bugfix for you.
> 
> Your src/Makefile is missing opt.c in the lint section.
> 
> 'make lint' errors:
> 
> Both versions complain of implicit declaration for 'strdup'.
> main.c 29:2 "newfilename"
> 
> Both versions complain of pointer from integer without a cast.
> main.c 29:13 "newfilename"
> 
> The experimental version complains of parenthesis for '-'
>    for '&' operand.
> opt.c 29:4 "fold2"
>   (missing parenthesis in case OP_MUL: section)

-- 
Nils M Holm  < n m h @ t 3 x . o r g >  www.t3x.org

Thread

Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-01 13:41 +0000
  Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 17:08 -0400
    Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 17:15 -0400
    Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 18:14 -0400
      Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-02 06:23 +0000
        Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-02 06:13 -0400
          Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-02 06:38 -0400
          Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-02 18:23 +0000
            Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-02 18:42 +0000
              Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-02 21:02 -0400
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 08:00 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-03 08:33 -0400
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 13:40 +0000
  Re: Testers wanted! "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 22:02 +0100
    Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 08:11 +0000
      Re: Testers wanted! "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-03 10:22 +0100
        Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 10:03 +0000
        Re: Testers wanted! "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-03 11:02 +0100
          Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 10:58 +0000
            Re: Testers wanted! "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-03 12:44 +0100
              Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 13:42 +0000
    Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 08:21 +0000
      Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 11:03 +0000
  Re: Testers wanted! Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-05-03 12:33 +0200
    Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 10:59 +0000
      Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 11:02 +0000
        Re: Testers wanted! Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-05-03 13:12 +0200
          Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 11:18 +0000
            Re: Testers wanted! Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-05-03 16:14 +0200
              Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-03 14:28 +0000
  Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-04 21:55 -0400
    Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-05 07:07 +0000
      Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-05 04:13 -0400
        Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-05 04:18 -0400
          Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-05 06:52 -0400
            Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-07 14:49 +0000
              Re: Testers wanted! "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 20:50 +0100
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-08 08:37 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-08 10:50 +0200
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-08 08:55 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 10:21 +0100
                Re: Testers wanted! George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-08 13:43 -0400
    Re: Testers wanted! Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-05-05 20:29 +0200
      Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-05 19:09 -0400
        Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-12 07:06 +0000
          Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-12 16:18 +0000
            Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0400
              Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-13 14:24 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-13 17:04 -0400
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-14 16:50 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-14 19:04 -0400
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-16 09:39 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-16 17:33 -0400
                Re: Testers wanted! Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2014-05-17 20:25 +0000
                Re: Testers wanted! "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-30 04:28 -0400

csiph-web