Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2316
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage, alt.comp.periphs.hdd |
| Subject | Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? |
| Date | 2014-04-20 13:02 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <brgrndF8umlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <VLqdnVDGnrZrN8_OnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@earthlink.com> <B8SdnW5VSrXoJc_OnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink.com> <brg69qF4vtjU1@mid.individual.net> <bvSdnQ7C3eqai87OnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote >>> Those results look bad? :( >> Not too bad if they don't keep increasing. > Really? Yeah, a few reallocated sectors are no big deal on a drive that old. Some of those older drives don't handle mains failure that well and can produce a bad sector that way and then just reallocate that bad sector. > Hmm. I will keep my compound eyes on it then. > I wonder if Linux/Debian will keep notifying about them daily like this > morning. Dunno, I don't use that much so can't say about that. > Today was the (fir/1)st day. FYI on the latest results: > > # smartctl -a /dev/sda > smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [x86_64-linux-3.2.0-4-amd64] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === > Model Family: Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 and 7200.7 Plus > Device Model: ST380011A > Serial Number: 4JV5P7LN > Firmware Version: 8.01 > User Capacity: 80,026,361,856 bytes [80.0 GB] > Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical > Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] > ATA Version is: 6 > ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2 > Local Time is: Sat Apr 19 17:30:30 2014 PDT > SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. > SMART support is: Enabled > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > > General SMART Values: > Offline data collection status: (0x82) Offline data collection activity > was completed without error. > Auto Offline Data Collection: > Enabled. > Self-test execution status: ( 118) The previous self-test completed > having > the read element of the test > failed. > Total time to complete Offline > data collection: ( 430) seconds. > Offline data collection > capabilities: (0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate. > Auto Offline data collection > on/off support. > Suspend Offline collection upon > new > command. > Offline surface scan supported. > Self-test supported. > No Conveyance Self-test supported. > Selective Self-test supported. > SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering > power-saving mode. > Supports SMART auto save timer. > Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. > General Purpose Logging supported. > Short self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 1) minutes. > Extended self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 58) minutes. > > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED > WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 056 053 006 Pre-fail > - 117120139 > 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 098 098 000 Pre-fail > - 0 > 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age > - 0 > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail > - 6 > 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 089 060 030 Pre-fail > - 929899528 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 019 019 000 Old_age > - 71043 > 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail > - 0 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age > - 362 > 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 037 053 000 Old_age Always - > 37 > 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 056 053 000 Old_age Always - > 117120139 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - > 1 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age > ne - 1 > 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - > 0 > 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age > ne - 0 > 202 Data_Address_Mark_Errs 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always - > 0 That's the same as what you posted yesterday on the most important bad sector data. > SMART Error Log Version: 1 > No Errors Logged > > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 > Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) > LBA_of_first_error > # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% 5502 > 67691664 > # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% 5501 > 67691664 > # 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5501 - > # 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5501 - > # 5 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% 5501 > 67691664 > # 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% 5501 - > # 7 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% 5499 > 67691664 > # 8 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 3165 - > # 9 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 48483 - > #10 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 43207 - > #11 Extended offline Interrupted (host reset) 90% 43201 - > #12 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 39844 - > #13 Extended offline Interrupted (host reset) 20% 38502 - > #14 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 35555 - > #15 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 31886 - > #16 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 22233 - > #17 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 18951 - > #18 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 18674 - > #19 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 15957 - > #20 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 14448 - > > SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 > SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS > 1 0 0 Not_testing > 2 0 0 Not_testing > 3 0 0 Not_testing > 4 0 0 Not_testing > 5 0 0 Not_testing > Selective self-test flags (0x0): > After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. > If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute > delay. > How come it can't complete the long tests though? Dunno. > It only gets about 40% done and then fails. Isn't that a bad sign? I don't test drives like that, just watch the bad sector numbers to see if they change.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-19 09:57 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-19 10:55 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-19 11:56 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:56 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-19 17:34 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 13:02 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-19 23:16 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Robert Nichols <SEE_SIGNATURE@localhost.localdomain.invalid> - 2014-04-20 07:19 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-20 09:54 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-20 09:57 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Robert Nichols <SEE_SIGNATURE@localhost.localdomain.invalid> - 2014-04-21 07:56 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-21 08:08 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-22 01:31 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-21 19:02 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 05:24 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-04-22 19:03 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 14:42 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-22 23:27 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Robert Nichols <SEE_SIGNATURE@localhost.localdomain.invalid> - 2014-04-23 09:03 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 06:32 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-24 00:26 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-04-23 18:47 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-10-19 21:05 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 05:13 +1100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-10-20 16:04 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 07:01 +1100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-10-21 15:56 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2014-10-22 22:43 +0000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-10-24 08:18 -0700
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2014-10-24 15:39 +0000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2014-10-24 20:23 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 11:20 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-24 09:47 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 06:35 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-24 00:23 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 11:17 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-24 09:55 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 05:17 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-27 19:12 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 19:59 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 05:22 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-20 11:08 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-04-20 10:13 +0100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-04-20 12:28 +0200
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 05:52 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 05:50 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? cjt <cheljuba@prodigy.net> - 2014-04-20 19:35 -0500
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2014-04-22 12:59 +0100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Vic RR Garcia <VicGar007@at-gmail.dot.com> - 2014-04-22 13:23 -0400
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 05:30 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2014-04-22 20:57 +0100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 14:37 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 05:28 +1000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-01-03 19:11 -0800
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Robert Nichols <SEE_SIGNATURE@localhost.localdomain.invalid> - 2015-01-04 12:11 -0600
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-01-04 12:38 -0800
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2015-01-04 23:02 +0000
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-01-04 15:21 -0800
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-01-05 08:18 +1100
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-01-04 15:21 -0800
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-01-04 06:44 -0800
Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2014-04-20 06:55 +1000
csiph-web