Groups > comp.databases.ms-access > #9180

Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition?

From	"Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.databases.ms-access
Subject	Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition?
Date	2014-03-23 14:13 -0500
Message-ID	<bp8q2sFpjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <bopnleFo3msU1@mid.individual.net> <boq5dbFqhukU1@mid.individual.net> <kt9ki9d01gj143ru8f6o7ub9dalq983tkp@4ax.com> <bovfkjF13gU1@mid.individual.net> <532decc2$0$51269$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>

Show all headers | View raw

Thanks, it is good to have confirmation from someone who's actually 'been 
there, done that, got the t-shirt', rather than those of us just quoting 
what Microsoft says, and second-hand statements.

 -- 
 Larry Linson
  Microsoft Office Access MVP
  Co-Author, Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions, Wiley 2010

"PR" <randlov_(remove this)@post9.tele.dk> wrote in message 
news:532decc2$0$51269$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> Hi Croy
> I have a very large database (about 20.000 fields and lots of VBA code).
> It is originally developed in Access 2000 and now maintained with Access 
> 2003. In the beginning it was distributed with the expensive Access 2000 
> runtime version, which also was tricky to install. However, it runs 
> flawlesly with all later free runtime-version, and is presently 
> distributed with MS Access 2010 runtime, and no users have complained.
> Since each field represent a photo in .jpg format the database is now more 
> than 8GB so I have to distribute on an USB-stick including the 2010 
> runtime-software and it works without problems.
> Peter

Back to comp.databases.ms-access | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-15 07:28 -0700
  Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-15 22:05 -0500
    Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-16 10:25 -0700
      Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-16 16:45 -0500
      Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 21:00 -0500
        Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 00:54 -0500
          Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-19 16:33 -0700
            Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-20 01:17 -0500
            Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-20 01:20 -0500
              Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "PR" <randlov_(remove this)@post9.tele.dk> - 2014-03-22 21:04 +0100
                Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-23 14:13 -0500

csiph-web