Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #273897
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| References | (3 earlier) <da6d8b8ad56e4f2cfff5495825cd11ad@dizum.com> <op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> <d6469ff731724d362761d8cd31b77e1a@dizum.com> <op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:42:21 -0400,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider)
>>>>> of
>>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>>>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>>>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>>>>>> bullshit to him.
>
>>>>> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
>>>>> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
>>>>> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
>>>>> the 'WTC nuke' delusion
>
>>>> try again, idiot. i said no such thing.
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> he can't handle your "truth"
>>>
>>> Your implication that what Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) spews is
>>> "truth".
>
>> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?
>
> Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?
>
> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
> =================================================
> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
so, strawman argument on your part?
>
> And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
> crying. :(
>
> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
> Dimmy.
> =================================================
>
>> how very "smart" of you.
>
> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
> =================================================
>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>
>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>
> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack have to be really
stupid or else you can't manage?
<points and laughs>
>
> <snicker>
> =================================================
>
> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
> stupid, DildoRider.
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> because it's imaginary bullshit to him."
>>>
>>> Implying
>
>> i implied nothing. it seems you inferred something though.
>
> You implied... now you're backpedaling. Kook. LOL
>
>>> that it's *not* "imaginary bullshit" to you.
>
>> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me. ...like k0okyKemtrail
>> konspiracies you're a rube for.
>
> Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?
>
> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
> =================================================
> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
strawman argument... again.
hey dimbulb... are 97% of the world's climatologists "libtards"?
>
> And that's why you're melting down...
based on your verbosity in response to a few of my words, most would say
that you were the one melting down, "jeenyus".
> because your own libtard
> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
> crying. :(
more strawman fallacy from snickerTurds.
>
> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
> Dimmy.
> =================================================
>
> If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
> tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>>
>>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> Climate change denying kook. LOL
>
>> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven
>
> Lying kook. Even a former lead author
former?
> for the IPCC says you Klimate
> Katastrophe Kooks are full of shit:
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
> forcing
are you claiming that *you* were a lead author for the IPCC?
maybe that's why you're so angry.
>
> SPNAK! #1
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> =================================================
> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>
> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>
> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
> world has warmed over the last century.
>
> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>
> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
> they otherwise would.
>
> =================================================
> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
> one iota.
>
> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
> =================================================
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
> LOL
>
> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
> keep trying to sell.
>
>> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
>> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.
>
> You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
> of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
> humans are causing global warming
>
> SPNAK! #4
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
> =========================================================
> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
> caused!".
>
> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>
> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
> University of Queensland.
>
> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
> science articles.
>
> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
> uncertain."
>
> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
> position that humans are causing the warming."
>
> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>
> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
> that hard math eludes them.
> =========================================================
>
> Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL
note that Cook does not subscribe to your conservatard smear tactics,
snickers:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-determine-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming/
"The latest surveys show that 89 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of
independents and 70 percent of Republicans already believe global warming
is happening and is at least partly caused by human actions."
...
There's no doubt that Cook regards climate change as a moral issue.
"As a father, I realized that we are handing over a world to our children
that is worse than the world we were given," he said over the phone from
Brisbane, Australia. "And as a Christian, I saw climate change as a social
justice issue."
...
Cook thinks that politicians are not acting because the public is not
pressuring them enough. If people realize that the majority of scientists
agree on human-caused climate change, they will absorb that knowledge like
empty vessels and become more convinced of the threat, he said. They will
then be more amenable to picking up their phones and calling their
legislators.
"If the public think that climate scientists agree about what is causing
global warming, then the public thinks we need to act on it," he said. "If
the public thinks scientists disagree, then we might as well wait until
the scientists work it out before we do anything about it."
>
>>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing
>>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.
>
>>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL
>
>> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".
>
> <points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL
and where have i denied climate change? ever.
>
>>>>> as you continue your long, slow slide into
>>>>> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
>>>>> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>
>>>> get a life, goof.
>
>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>
>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>> =================================================
>
> Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
> chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL
>
more strawman fallacy from someone who sure k'laims to be smarter than
that.
--
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
--
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:40 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 12:47 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:02 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:50 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:06 -0400
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0700
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:56 -0500
caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:02 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 17:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:22 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 18:20 -0500
caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:00 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:07 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:36 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:04 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 10:06 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:02 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:07 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:48 +0200
Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 05:47 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 04:12 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.physics.cunt.scabs> - 2015-08-25 10:45 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:11 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 06:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:00 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 19:06 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:11 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:47 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:20 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 22:35 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:32 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:12 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 23:17 +0000
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:21 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 16:17 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:19 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 16:19 -0500
csiph-web