Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #8665

Re: Why PHP?

From "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Re: Why PHP?
Date 2013-03-14 23:50 +0100
Message-ID <aqf2hiFaf1vU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <khdc28$jtf$2@news.albasani.net> <ecKdncXmiPM53KfMnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <513CAA86.5040606@arnowelzel.de> <khis63$7b4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <514221DA.1050804@arnowelzel.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 14.03.2013 20:15, schrieb Arno Welzel:
> Christoph Becker, 2013-03-10 21:59:
> 
>> Arno Welzel wrote:
>>
>>> Well - Facebook has enough money to run *many* servers. I think in this
>>> case it is nearly irrelevant if they use PHP, C# or whatever - as long
>>> as the backend (database, storage etc.) is capable of handling the load.
>>
>> Apparently it is not that irrelevant; otherwise they wouldn't have
>> developed HipHop.
> 
> Indeed - Facebook does not use "native" PHP - instead they compile
> everything from PHP to C++ and then to native machine code ;-)

Such systems are not created over night, and not following the manual.

I am quite sure they tried everything possible, and some impossible ways to deliver
the required performance. This is a long process, everybody has to go through
according to his special needs.

/Str.


Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-07 23:14 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 01:03 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-08 08:45 -0500
  Re: Why PHP? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-03-08 10:11 -0700
    Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-08 18:53 +0000
      Re: Why PHP? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2013-03-08 13:53 -0600
        Re: Why PHP? Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2013-03-09 15:41 -0800
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 00:06 +0000
        Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 16:45 +0100
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 16:54 +0000
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 19:43 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-10 16:51 -0400
          Re: Why PHP? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-03-10 21:59 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-14 20:15 +0100
              Re: Why PHP? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2013-03-14 23:50 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-08 18:37 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:38 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 22:06 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:46 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-09 12:22 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? David Heller <daveh@allheller.net> - 2013-03-09 06:13 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-09 16:22 +0100

csiph-web