Re: Why PHP?

From	Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.php
Subject	Re: Why PHP?
Date	2013-03-10 16:51 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<khirmb$end$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <khd60q$ueg$1@dont-email.me> <khdc28$jtf$2@news.albasani.net> <ecKdncXmiPM53KfMnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <513CAA86.5040606@arnowelzel.de> <khidrc$vjl$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/10/2013 12:54 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 10/03/13 15:45, Arno Welzel wrote:
>> Robert Heller, 2013-03-08 20:53:
>>
>>> At Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:53:00 +0000 The Natural Philosopher
>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/03/13 17:11, Martin Leese wrote:
>>>>> clayjar@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> A particular individual on the C# team likes the word "enterprise" a
>>>>>> lot and still believes PHP to be a mere toy that kids play around
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> to build Personal Home Pages.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> I'm sincerely asking the PHP community here to point me to some
>>>>>> objective materials to help convince my (very pro-Microsoft) coworker
>>>>>> and our boss that LAMP stack is a VERY viable alternative to other
>>>>>> proprietary platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Facebook is implemented in PHP.
>>>>>
>>>> Is that a recommendation or a dis-recommendation?
>>>
>>> Well Facebook is certainly an enterprise operation and is very
>>> profitable, which suggest that PHP is not a "toy".  Facebook has a huge
>>> user base and seems to manage quite well.  This suggests that LAMP
>>> servers scale well.
>>
>> Well - Facebook has enough money to run *many* servers. I think in this
>> case it is nearly irrelevant if they use PHP, C# or whatever - as long
>> as the backend (database, storage etc.) is capable of handling the load.
>>
>>
> The American solution. Throw money and hardware at sub standard software
> ? :-)
>
>>
>
>

Hardware is cheap.  Americans use cost-effective methods.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Thread

Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-07 23:14 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 01:03 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-08 08:45 -0500
  Re: Why PHP? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-03-08 10:11 -0700
    Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-08 18:53 +0000
      Re: Why PHP? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2013-03-08 13:53 -0600
        Re: Why PHP? Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2013-03-09 15:41 -0800
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 00:06 +0000
        Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 16:45 +0100
          Re: Why PHP? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-10 16:54 +0000
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-10 19:43 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-03-10 16:51 -0400
          Re: Why PHP? Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> - 2013-03-10 21:59 +0100
            Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-14 20:15 +0100
              Re: Why PHP? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2013-03-14 23:50 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-08 18:37 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:38 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-03-08 22:06 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? clayjar@gmail.com - 2013-03-08 21:46 -0800
    Re: Why PHP? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-03-09 12:22 +0100
  Re: Why PHP? David Heller <daveh@allheller.net> - 2013-03-09 06:13 -0800
  Re: Why PHP? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-03-09 16:22 +0100

csiph-web