Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1314

Re: 'eofill'ing areas

From Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.postscript
Subject Re: 'eofill'ing areas
Date 2013-03-13 18:00 +0100
Organization not that I'm aware of ...
Message-ID <aqbpu1Fih0uU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <aq4bsuFseg3U3@mid.individual.net> <aq6figFc882U1@mid.individual.net> <aq6h17FciaaU1@mid.individual.net> <aq986fF11urU1@mid.individual.net> <aqb4g9Fdk4tU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2013-03-13 11:59, "Helge Blischke" wrote:

> Probably it is an distiller issiue with the charpath operator.

Apparently, yes, and a rather nasty bug.

>                                                                The path 
> generated by charpath should be appended to the current path (according to 
> the PLRM) but it seems the distiller's implementation clears the current 
> path in advance.
> I tested this with Mac OS X pstopdf utility (which is used with the preview 
> application as well).
> 
> [...]

I tried another approach as well: using "eoclip" instead of "eofill" to
define just a clipping area, and then re-drawing the rectangle and
filling it, which didn't work either.

So I'll have to print white text onto a coloured background.

By the way: using the "charpath" operator with a simple "clip" to define
a clipping area _does_ work as expected. Therefore the bug may as well
be within Distiller's "even-odd" logic.

Michael

-- 
Real names enhance the probability of getting real answers.
My e-mail account at DECUS Munich is no longer valid.

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-10 18:46 +0100
  Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-10 22:22 +0100
    Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-11 17:31 +0100
      Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-11 18:02 +0100
        Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-12 18:45 +0100
          Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 11:59 +0100
            Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-13 18:00 +0100
              Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 18:20 +0100
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:25 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:31 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-20 13:28 -0700
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-21 17:30 +0100
                Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-21 17:52 +0100
  Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-10 18:48 -0700

csiph-web