Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #1333
| From | Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: 'eofill'ing areas |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.postscript |
| Date | 2013-03-21 17:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ar0s6pF8r97U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <aqbpu1Fih0uU1@mid.individual.net> <aqbqrkFio4fU1@mid.individual.net> <f8a3bb04-e360-4114-969d-f74efb38bd9e@googlegroups.com> <77c30b3a-9d42-4e19-ae4a-99849c745e4b@googlegroups.com> <ar0r5hF8jv5U2@mid.individual.net> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.postscript
Michael Unger wrote:
> On 2013-03-20 21:28, "luser- -droog" wrote:
>
>> Which font fails? It might be that Acrobat can only do this with PS
>> fonts, not TrueType.
>
> Just with respect to my experiments -- the original fonts are TrueType
> fonts. I've created MS Word documents containing the relevant glyphs
> A...Z, a...z, 0...9 (and a few others) and created a PDF document from
> that using Acrobat 6 Standard (rather old admittedly). Finally I've used
> Acrobat with "save as EPS" and "[x] convert TrueType fonts to PostScript
> fonts" (or similar, I don't remember the exact phrasing) and extracted
> the font information from that.
>
> The result is then embedded as a PostScript level 3 font dictionary into
> my programs, for example (showing just the "period" glyph):
>
> | /ABCDEF+OptimaLT
> | << /FontType 1
> | /FontMatrix [0.001 0 0 0.001 0 0]
> | /Encoding ISOLatin1Encoding
> | /FontBBox [0 0 0 0]
> | /PaintType 0
> | /Private
> | << /|- {def}
> | /| {put}
> | /BlueValues [0 0]
> | /Password 5839
> | /MinFeature {16 16}
> | /Subrs
> | [<1C60D8A8CC31FE2BF6E07AA3E541E2> <1C60D8A8C9C3D06D9E>
> | <1C60D8A8C9C202D79A> <1C60D8A849>
> | <1C60D8A8CC3674F41144B13B77>]
> | /OtherSubrs
> | [{} {} {} {systemdict /internaldict known not {pop 3}
> | {1183615869 systemdict /internaldict get exec dup
> | /startlock known {/startlock get exec} {dup
> | /strtlck known {/strtlck get exec} {pop 3} ifelse} ifelse}
> | ifelse} executeonly]
> | >>
> | /CharStrings
> | << /.notdef
> | <1C60D8A8C9B854D00D>
> | /space
> | <1C60D8A8C9B854D00D>
> | /period
> | <1C60D8A8C9B854D0ED1EFCAE87DC2FD148747CF8209152983DF13290A098
> | 1A95FE8A38221E1CA30B7BCA347D12229301D0EAAEBE7CFF9A6A629E95F74
> | 357C9866243F6F3C4>
> | >>
> | >> definefont
>
> Michael
>
I don't think it is a font type issue:
I noted earlier that the Mac OS X Preview application exhibits the same
error, and I just repeated the test with a Type1 font included in the PS
file, and the issue result is as bogus as before.
Helge
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-10 18:46 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-10 22:22 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-11 17:31 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-11 18:02 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-12 18:45 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 11:59 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-13 18:00 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-13 18:20 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:25 -0700
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Olle <olavi.sakari@gmail.com> - 2013-03-19 00:31 -0700
Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-20 13:28 -0700
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Michael Unger <spam.to.unger@spamgourmet.com> - 2013-03-21 17:30 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas Helge Blischke <h.blischke@acm.org> - 2013-03-21 17:52 +0100
Re: 'eofill'ing areas luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-10 18:48 -0700
csiph-web