Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) |
| Date | 2014-03-02 23:48 -0500 |
| Organization | National Capital Freenet, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1403022344480.22572@darkstar.example.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <lenae7$vph$1@news.albasani.net> <bn94q2Fcn96U1@mid.individual.net> <4773#11255@usenet.squte.com> <leo61k$kav$1@solani.org> <878usu8fb9.fsf@nudel.nodomain.nowhere> |
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014, Mike Spencer wrote: > > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: > > [ Very reasonable discussion omitted. ] > >>> ...misc.news.internet.discuss... >> >> In the short term while we get organized, I'll post the technical- but >> not-comp stuff on m.n.i.d and I guess we'll see how it goes. > > Don't overlook that the early hackers/geeks of the 50s and 60s were > not only telecom techs but variously mathematicians, chemists, > engineers, physicists, musicians, neuroscientists and anthropologists > inter alia who were drawn, to one degree or another, to IT. > That's a big point. "Hacker" becomes an identity to take on, it sounds cool. I would argue "hacking" is experience based learning, so does Seymour Papert. Small children hack, they dont' have language skills to learn except through experience. Adults can hack those samll children, watching them and learning from them rather than rushing to books and learning before the child is there to learn from. One might as well use "explorer" or "map maker", the experience teaching. Michael
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-25 20:30 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-25 23:19 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-02-26 09:36 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" SlimmPickens <lachlanmoss@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 02:50 -0800
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-26 15:03 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 23:42 +0100
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-26 11:24 -0300
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:51 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 11:06 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 12:18 +0000
non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 15:44 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 16:58 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 11:05 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-27 12:22 -0600
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:09 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:39 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:50 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-03-01 04:59 -0400
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:43 -0500
csiph-web