Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) |
| Date | 2014-03-01 04:59 -0400 |
| Organization | Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop |
| Message-ID | <878usu8fb9.fsf@nudel.nodomain.nowhere> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <lel7bs$vm4$1@solani.org> <lenae7$vph$1@news.albasani.net> <bn94q2Fcn96U1@mid.individual.net> <4773#11255@usenet.squte.com> <leo61k$kav$1@solani.org> |
RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: [ Very reasonable discussion omitted. ] >> ...misc.news.internet.discuss... > > In the short term while we get organized, I'll post the technical- but > not-comp stuff on m.n.i.d and I guess we'll see how it goes. Don't overlook that the early hackers/geeks of the 50s and 60s were not only telecom techs but variously mathematicians, chemists, engineers, physicists, musicians, neuroscientists and anthropologists inter alia who were drawn, to one degree or another, to IT. I agree that under the Usenet rubric, comp.misc mandates some connection to comp(puters). But 70 or so years on from the Macy Conferences, (q.g.) [1] not all techno-geeks are narrowly into IT per se and cross fertilization is good for many, perhaps most of us. Good luck with agreeing on a suitably more general venue. I'll start looking at mnid myself. [1] q.g. Quod google. More neutral than gify. Like q.v., quod vide. :-) -- Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-25 20:30 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-25 23:19 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-02-26 09:36 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" SlimmPickens <lachlanmoss@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 02:50 -0800
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-26 15:03 +0200
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2014-03-02 23:42 +0100
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-26 11:24 -0300
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-26 12:51 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 11:06 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks "designer babies" Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 12:18 +0000
non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 15:44 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-02-27 16:58 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 11:05 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-27 12:22 -0600
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:09 +0000
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies "wjwlsn" <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 14:39 -0600
Re: Fertility procedure risks designer babies RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-27 20:50 +0000
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-03-01 04:59 -0400
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:48 -0500
Re: non-comp tech articles (was fertility ...) Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-03-02 23:43 -0500
csiph-web